Why are the prices of the RX 480 high? Weren't they planned to be around $200?
Edit: Nevermind! I posted after only checking amazon... newegg shows closer prices to what was expected. Thanks anyways!
Earlier I asked whether there will be 4GB nitro or not. I've read a topic on reddit yesterday. Some AMD official says there might be 4GB nitro in late july/early august but seems too early given they didn't even batch out the 8GB nitros yet. To be fairly honest, I find 8GB version for a mid-tier card to be a bit unnecessary. The card is not powerful enough (be it in terms of memory bandwidth or computation power) to utilize 8GB memory in full efficiency. I will be building a system in late july/early august. Hope Nvidia releases GTX 1060 as early as possible. Need to check that as well.
well tbh noSo the card performs exactly as a lot of us expected?
I didnt hype it to 980Ti/1070 levels like some did, but I was almost positive it would be trading blows with stock 980/390X or at least be very very close to the 980
instead the reference is on 970/390 level or just slightly above that
however the price is so low that its a still a good p/p
the reference is horrible though with that awful tiny heatsink, noisy cooler and the PCI-E power issues .. AIB only for this one
Well reference blowers are not bad for what they are, you are guaranteed they are dual slot, blow air out of the case and do not interfere with other cards in the case. I had a nasty surprise with my custom 290X when I realized it's 2 and a 1/10 slot instead of 2 for example.
Besides, if Nvidia/AMD would start slapping custom cooling solutions it would make their partners sad... and I don't think it's in their interest to make partners sad.
It's about time I upgrade from my reference 7950. Only problem I have with it is that it's loud as hell. So I'm debating between the RX480 or the GTX1060... honestly both will run anything I throw at them easily so my only requirement is that the card runs quiet. The Sapphire card looks interesting, I'll have to wait for reviews though.
Amazon's reviews on those RX 480's are hilarious. All the 1 star rating people kept saying, "overpriced do not buy, wait for stock". I expect that kind of overpricing on Ebay, not Amazon. Who's going to spend $300+ for a RX 480? But the prices of GTX 970's and R9 290's are dropping fast on Ebay. Particularly the R9 290's, which are already bellow $200. Not enough to make me want to buy one now, as a used R9 290 vs a new RX 480 makes no sense. Both the GTX 970 and R9 290 would have to be bellow $150 for a used card. For 50 more I get a new card that's faster.
Is there no way to improve the cooling on reference though? I mean, are we really seeing the pinnacle of blower-fan coolers? The heatsink itself is very small for one, relative to the size of the overall cooler. There's a lot of empty space on the coolers as a result.
https://www.arctic.ac/eu_en/products/cooling/vga.html
http://www.gelidsolutions.com/produc...p?lid=1&cid=17
There if you want superior to Reference design cooling on a reference card.
The Gelid ones will get an update AFAIK if the Rev. 2 doesn't fit already.
Having a larger chip with more conservative clocking/voltage is technically better but also pricier. The companies earn more money if they can make a smaller chip that clocks higher and performs well, even with a higher power consumption.
People might bash Apple a lot, but they indeed do some things right and one of those things are their SoC designs. They always go with large conservative chips, and they always outperform the competition.