Complete BS...He does not need to lead the negotiations, just invoke the article...after it the Leave champions can take it over...somehow they do not want it.
Plus because if you do a campaign to achieve a huge change in your country, then you must have a plan after the achievment. Simple common sense..for you does not sounds lame "Leave!Leave! We want to leave! Ok we doing, what now? Errm..."?
November 9,1989: Fall of the Berlin Wall <=== The crucial event. Completely unexpected.
November 28,1989: West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl announces a 10-point program for reunification by federation <=== Announcing the plan.
October 30,1990: The flag of a reunited Germany is raised over the Reichstag in Berlin. The GDR ceases to exist. Fireworks go off across the city. <=== Plan completed.(Mostly)
Compared to:
June 23,2016: EU Referendum, Leave wins. <=== The crucial event. Lots of time for preparation.
June 24,2016: Cameron jumps ship (understandable)
June 30,2016: Johnson jumps ship
July 4,2016: Farage jumps ship
sometime in early September (hopefully): New PM <=== Announcing the plan...maybe?
That time frame was set out by Cameron himself, funnily enough. The process takes time, the candidates need to set out their intentions and the process consists two stages of voting.
- - - Updated - - -
So he invokes the article now and then we waste 3 months of it doing absolutely nothing while we elect a new leader? Sounds like a cracking plan...
They've set out things they would like to do or what future governments could do, but they weren't an opposition government, they were never going to draft a full brexit plan.
Not one of them has said they no longer want to leave, the closest to it we've come is Boris Johnson writing a weird article suggesting a sort of brexit-lite which he has later contradicted. Unless you've got any actual evidence of this rather than just stating what you assume is fact.
In the UK when we vote we are electing members of parliament almost all of which represent a political party, when the votes are counted the party or coalition of parties with the majority share of MPs becomes the government. The leader of the party in government (or leader of the party forming the majority of the coalition) then becomes PM.
The leader of the party in government (David Cameron, Conservatives) has resigned as party leader. This means he will continue to serve as Prime Minister until his party elect a new leader to replace him, at which point they will become Prime Minister, and electing a party leader is not an overnight affair.
NB: This is a similar situation as the demise of Margaret Thatcher, where she was deposed as leader but continued to be PM until a replacement leader replaced her.
I'm sorry, but you are speaking as though you have no idea about British politics. Only Tory MPs would realistically be in a position to 'see it through' and not one of them has dropped off the face of the Earth as far as I'm aware. Could you try and be more specific about anyone you actually mean?
I don't know how British politics work. And you know what I mean. Everyone is laughing at the two biggest Leave supporters leaving their position, because they don't want to deal with it, not even accidently. If god forbid their party wins they would be at the helm when the ship goes down.