I guess some would argue that we can further balance the playing field by giving a bit of legal advantages to men to counter the advantage women get by being able to decide whether to give birth or not... But in practice, such attempts usually result in a big legal and ethical mess.
The current system works fine most of the time, and it definitely works fine for responsible individuals, who don't just go for pleasure, ignoring the possible consequences, and make informed decisions.
stopping a process that occurs once a month and has a biological mechanism to stop itself in place already is going to be a lot easier then stopping something that happens a million times in the span of your lunch break and is designed to carry on for your entire life after puberty.
Troll confirmed.
Ignore entire post and stay on the Southpark stick. At least Hana and I can still have a discussion on something he/she understands. Nothing wrong with being ignorant. But purposefully ignoring an explanation/argument is just tacky.
Welcome to my ignore list.
No, it's about respecting the laws that have been put in place to protect people from person to person exploitation. Don't get me wrong, there are feckless women on the other side who think they're gaming the system, but whatever they may or may not get from the system, they just got a child they're responsible for. That has a hell of lot more impact on their lives than paying child support does.
You might have to clarify what you mean by last hour regrets for me, are you suggesting abortion mere hours before they're about to give birth?
It is simpler to do female contraception. That much is evident. If it was easier for men to take a pill then we would have had that first. However, I think govt should still support male contraception. If women have autonomy like that then it is only right for men to as well. If the situation was flipped, Feminism would be fighting for just that (and rightfully so)
A risk, up to the involved parties if they're willing to take it. There's also genital disease to consider when you want to sleep around with people you don't know. Most people wouldn't trust a stranger with their house or car or even phone in many cases, yet people risk their lives (unwanted children, diseases) for some fleeting pleasure with strangers...
Last edited by Queen of Hamsters; 2016-07-10 at 01:19 AM.
Meant more along the lines of a couple that, originally, wants kids and then she decides she doesn't. Which is perfectly okay and we shouldn't force anyone to give birth. Was more of a snap at the, what seemed, to be an insinuation that the men that wish to be fathers are close to nonexistent and it's mostly a case of poor women having to carry the burden on their own while all men just want to bail out.
Reading it closely I might have snapped too harshly (and not coherently enough) - it's late, so apologies
Quite alright. I think the problem with couples who have this sort of conflict is that the issue tends to be the deathknell of their relationship anyway, especially if it isn't simply a situation where one of them is saying "We aren't ready yet".
If it's so important to the man he'll move on (with luck) to another relationship where it isn't a problem. There is the possibility of ending up wanting to be a bachelor father, and I think the processes using donors and surrogates will be more expensive than it is for a woman with the same desires, but there are certainly options.
This is why stairs were invented. Just say you want to propose on the Empire State Building.
"Why of course the people don't want war…. But, after all… it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
Let's be honest, most guys (people in general really) are far too stupid to pull off anything like that. Prison is filled with people who thought they were clever enough to get away with it.
But hey, upside is, you don't need to worry about Bunkmate Bubba making you preggers.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
As I posted earlier in this thread, men have to stop giving up their power to choose. Don't leave the decision for birth control in the hands of someone else. Use a condom every time or for a more guaranteed preventive method (and if you just hate condoms), get a no-scalpel-vasectomy procedure which is reversible if/when you decide to have kids. Don't tell anyone you had it done and it functions as a "cheater detector" too. Laugh all the way to the bank when some cheating hussy tries to say "oops" and "congratulate" you on becoming a father, and you whip out your medical forms and say "Nuh-uh lady!". While I don't have the experience of this myself, I was with a close friend when he did exactly that... and let me tell you the grin on his face, and the look of shock of hers was priceless!
But in a way it is partly the fault of men. It's their fault for giving up their right to choose. Men have to stop leaving birth control in someone elses hands and take that responsibility upon themselves for their own protection. Men have the power to make unplanned pregnancies impossible while having all the sex they want. They just have to make the choice to use it, cause once the bun is in the oven, men no longer have the choice and they have an inescapable responsibility to provide for that child if she chooses to keep it.
Last edited by Kyriani; 2016-07-10 at 02:08 AM.
The irony is palpable I agree. It is split 50/50 and yes, Men did give women the right to choose. I mean, we even gave them the right to vote (just being factual here)
What I dislike is when people act like women have no autonomy and are just objects to be acted upon when it is convenient in order to blame me.