Thats one thing I find odd. Like If I look at the old ghostbusters movie and the trailer for this one, I would say the ghosts look more real in the original. Even Jurassic Park 1 looked comparable to Jurassic World. Obviously there are some effects that look better in CGI today like the proton beams. I did think the CGI in Warcraft was amazing though.
Honestly I was really hoping this would happen. There has been an unreasonable amount of hate for this movie with some online critics going so far as to proudly declare they won't see it. Now it turns out the movie is actually good, not great but not the absolutely terrible film they all said it would be. The next couple of weeks should be fun.
I mean just make a quick comment about it, it doesn't need to be some 5 minute video just because you know it will be easy views. It just shows me they are gonna see it anyways if it turns out they were wrong.
Just in time for the reboot.
I'm not too sure what to make of the reviews for the film so far. Even the positive ones generally seem to be saying that the film is basically a piece of fluff cinema at best, but go ahead and give it a high rating, because it's putting two fingers up to the oppressive penis owners, trying to keep the film down. Half the positive reviews read quite weakly, then just end on tirades about feminism overcoming all things. Some of them even imply that the acting/comedy isn't very good in places.
Yeah, I just read a handful of the positive reviews and they all are just flaunting women and feminism and sticking it to those icky boys moreso than actually talking about the movie. Some flat out didn't mention the movie's contents at all
By the titans... The RT reviews... The large majority of the reviews are "the movie is fresh because females". I don't care, I'm gender egalitarian, review about the movie itself...
This is Warcraft all over again, reviewing the genre and not the details.
Last edited by mmoc516e31a976; 2016-07-12 at 09:53 PM.
He's from the internet, we have to believe him, right? Seriously though, this is a guy I generally see as having the pulse of the internet for movie reviews:
tl;dr: It's an average movie, not as bad as the trailers, not as good as its proponents want it to be, but doesn't live up to the original Ghostbusters. He also thought Hemsworth was the worst character, and McKinnon and Leslie Jones were the best.
I'd have to imagine even most die-hard fans aren't expecting this movie to top the original. I'm a huge Ghostbusters fan, have been every since I was a kid in the 80's, but the first Ghostbusters is a classic - you're not going to top it. And that's ok. I'm hoping its entertaining (and a lot of reviews seem to indicate this), and excited that it could lead to more fun Ghostbusters stuff in the future.
Some of you have it mistaken.
In the beginning, no one was hoping this film would fail. They just didn't like the trailer. That's all.
The director , SJW types and the media along with Sony, twisted that into an anti female narrative. And morons ate it up.
Now people want to see it fail? NOT CAUSE THEY BELIEVE THE FILM US THAT HORRID, though most think it sucks from leaks and trailers, they want it to fail cause the entire marketing of this film has been about shitting on the very fans of the franchise.
Last edited by Tempguy; 2016-07-13 at 07:28 PM.
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/ghostbu...203600062.html
this is golden!