Lol, you are so hung ho happy that you probably get to play with a gun it's gone to your head. News flash, you're not the only human on earth to operate a gun. You and your infinite knowledge about firearms is amazingly shared by millions. You're not special and don't have any sort of secret knowledge about guns or situations that give you authority to say shooting to kill was the only option. It's obvious there's an insecurity because any other attempt, just an attempt to think of a different outcome is shot down, no pun, or F it pun. That is a clear sign of insecurity. Instead of discussion, it's just a desperate attempt to make it seem like it was the only choice.
- - - Updated - - -
I wasn't selling.
Last edited by Stonecloak; 2016-07-14 at 05:45 PM.
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
His knowledge of guns may not be top secret, but he's got more of it than you. In that case listening to his knowledge (even if it isn't the best) is still better than reading your mental diarrhea about shooting people in limbs. Kindaly go away with that ridiculousness.
No, you're literally just suggesting that people do dangerous things with guns. Safety is the opposite of what you're suggesting, you're just too ignorant to see it and stubborn to accept what others are telling you.
Just acknowledge that you actually have no firsthand knowledge of the subject matter and move on, or better yet just accept that you could learn something here. It could save you from the future embarrassment of suggesting things like shooting at limbs or firing warning shots if you get into a real world discussion with someone who actually knows about gun safety like, for instance, a police officer.
You're also, at this point, resorting to ad hominems in every post. That suggests that you know you've lost, since you can't formulate actual arguments anymore and have to resort to insults.
Last edited by jackofwind; 2016-07-14 at 05:50 PM.
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Right and so I know that a warning shot can ricochet off a building or pavement and hit an innocent bystander. Every person who has fired a gun or been around them knows you dont fire warning shots. You will not find that as a policy in any Rules of Engagement in any Police Academy in any country. For you to suggest a warning shot shows you dont know this, which shows you dont know the capability of firearms. Which shows you have never operated a firearm.
This was last year, I remember this story as I live in Utah: http://fox13now.com/2015/07/29/grant...g-pioneer-day/... was sitting in a friend's backyard on Christley Street when the bullet entered her neck, brushed past her aorta and parked itself in her left lung. ... Police say it appears the weapon used was an AR-15 style rifle. They say as many has six rounds may have been fired into the sky, possibly from as far as a half a mile away.
MY X/Y POKEMON FRIEND CODE: 1418-7279-9541 In Game Name: Michael__
I agree they should not be judge jury and executioner, a lot of the shootings being reportedly lately disturb me greatly. I don't know if this one could have been handled differently, but I can't judge the office harshly, they saw someone acting suspicious, they tried to, non-violently stop moving towards them an show their hands, there is only so much they can do in that situation where they have seconds to act.
I am curious, what would others recommend the police have done in this situation? I'm being sincere here, cause in hindsight it would be easy to say to just tackle the suspect or use a taser, but both of those could have ended poorly if the suspect actually had been armed and intended to use their weapon.
One person is suggesting the police shoot limbs or firing warning shots, both of those, sorry to say, are idiotic ideas and would pose an even greater threat.
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Ah, bingo, and there it is. Regardless if a warning shot is safe or not, my point is people actually believe these policies are etched in stone within our reality. All your doing is regurgitating the very rules I'm saying need to be looked at. That's the problem with that thinking. It's stuck in a box, and obviously, so obviously not working anymore. All you're doing is saying police engagement says it's wrong, well guess what if anyone values life, they'll see police engagement needs to change, or get better.
Last edited by Stonecloak; 2016-07-14 at 05:59 PM.
Suicide by cop or the invincibility complex that comes with that age group.
You guys seriously sound like the worst shots ever. Is there a culture of this actually? "Hey guys, lets try and hit the center at the shooting range!". "F...that, try and just get in the facinity, that's good enough for any situation!". All this talk of gun "intelligence" and it sounds more wrong than I've ever heard.