There have been. There have been studies on single parent homes(mother or father), community raised children(raised by multiple family members, or tribe in some settings), and gay families. It was found that you do not need a mother and a father to be raised well. You have good and bad results form all groups. It is more about how kids are raised not what sex the parents are or the family structure.
- - - Updated - - -
Since they cannot rig districts for a national election, Republicans have almost no chance in national races. Their base and demographic that they speak for is ever shrinking.
- - - Updated - - -
You say that as if no straight parents have done terrible things to children ever.
- - - Updated - - -
That is certainly not the case. Traditional families are not any better suited for raising a child than a communal group or homosexual partners. It is about how they are raised. Not by whom. Children have been raised by groups for thousands of years. Society managed to progress just fine. The traditional family setting is relatively new in the scope of humanity. Both work as does single parenting. How it is done is more important that who it is done by.
- - - Updated - - -
Freedom only exists for the well to do white male Christians. Didn't you know that?
- - - Updated - - -
That time is coming to an end fortunately. Believers are decreasing in this country every year. 23% do not identify with any religious sect. It will only be a matter of time when being something matters.
The fact that no one has proven that homosexuality is harmful in any way, shape or form, to individuals or society.
- - - Updated - - -
I'm sure "nature" intended that I write you a message from potentially thousands of miles away that you can read within seconds . . . a message that very likely made a quick trip to space before arriving on your screen.
- - - Updated - - -
Infertile couples rely on a donor. Why does no one rant about them?
Putin khuliyo
Typical modern day republican. Keep government out of our lives, except if you are gay, a minority, or a woman. Then we will be all in it telling you what you are not allowed to do.
- - - Updated - - -
Probably wears a trilby thinking it's a fedora too.
So this gay marriage discussion is all well and good, but let's look at the OP and get on topic for a second:
The majority of America supports the rights for gays to get married, even large portions of the GOP. By holding onto draconian beliefs that gays should not marry the GOP is only hurting its chances at getting people into office and thus affecting change that they probably believe matters.
So which is it going to be, hold onto outdated beliefs and screw your political pull, or keep your bigotry to yourself and go for political change that actually matters? The crusade against gay marriage is just that, a religious crusade. You can either hold banning it above all other issues of importance, or let it go.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"