3DMark Time Spy DX 12 Benchmark released!

[Ghâzh]

After the Windows 10 upgrade, will the tabs still be there or will I have to go through and reopen them all?

http://www.technicalnotes.org/save-a...chromefirefox/

I've got you covered, have fun with windows 10.

[Deleted]

I think Vulcan right now is hyped a bit too much, because people saw the jump AMD did with it enabled in doom, but they forget that they were using something like OpenGL4.3 before, which is just horrible for GCN and limited their performance by tapping the CPU.

I think they patched that shortly after release, so AMD should also run at OGL 4.5.

[mrgreenthump]

I think they patched that shortly after release, so AMD should also run at OGL 4.5.

In anycase it was limited by the CPU performance.

[Moozart]

6928 Was the best i managed squeaking out of it this morning

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13309582?

[DeltrusDisc]

http://www.technicalnotes.org/save-a...chromefirefox/

I've got you covered, have fun with windows 10.

Still haven't gone through with it, but definitely considering. DX12 would be a nice feature. Damn you Microsoft, why must you be this way?!

[Deleted]

Not quite sure were to put this, but seeing as this is the benchmark tread I will put it here. Found something interesting on another forum.

So yeah... 3D Mark does not use the same type of Asynchronous compute found in all of the recent game titles. Instead.. 3D Mark appears to be specifically tailored so as to show nVIDIA GPUs in the best light possible. It makes use of Context Switches (good because Pascal has that improved pre-emption) as well as the Dynamic Load Balancing on Maxwell through the use of concurrent rather than parallel Asynchronous compute tasks. If parallelism was used then we would see Maxwell taking a performance hit under Time Fly as admitted by nVIDIA in their GTX 1080 white paper and as we have seen from AotS.

Interesting... Looks like 3Dmark gives Nvidia a bit of an advantage or better said they are negating the disadvantage. I mean, the results do show something else compared to the DX12 games out there.
I guess we will see how it unfolds for the first batch of DX12 games.

[Denpepe]

Not quite sure were to put this, but seeing as this is the benchmark tread I will put it here. Found something interesting on another forum.



Interesting... Looks like 3Dmark gives Nvidia a bit of an advantage or better said they are negating the disadvantage. I mean, the results do show something else compared to the DX12 games out there.
I guess we will see how it unfolds for the first batch of DX12 games.

I don't think there is anything wrong by using each cards/manufacturers strong points to get the best possible results the hardware is capable of, that's also what developpers now are going to have to do, only downside is that it's more work for them so might get done half-assed. Time will tell.

[Deleted]

SCORE 6 072

Graphics Score 6 320
CPU Score 4 971

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/22186

Currently down 2 sticks from my Signature Setup. Less strain on the Integrated Memory Controller for OC reasons ( I'm trying to underwolt the CPU )

[dadev]

Not quite sure were to put this, but seeing as this is the benchmark tread I will put it here. Found something interesting on another forum.



Interesting... Looks like 3Dmark gives Nvidia a bit of an advantage or better said they are negating the disadvantage. I mean, the results do show something else compared to the DX12 games out there.
I guess we will see how it unfolds for the first batch of DX12 games.

That quote is about equivalent to http://scigen.csail.mit.edu/scicache...x.17938.a.html. If you catch my drift

[Zenny]

Futuremark released a very detailed breakdown about how Time Spy works:

http://www.futuremark.com/pressrelea...dmark-time-spy

Rabid fanboys are still not convinced though and continue to use their tin foil hats:

http://steamcommunity.com/app/223850...6921455/?ctp=1

[SoulForge]

Scored a graphics score of 9812 and CPU of 4842.

Overall 8502

Program said the GPU drivers are a bit outdated. I'm going to run it again when I get home.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13446754?

[Hottage]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/63476

5477 with MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Gaming X 8G (1x) and Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.8Ghz

[Denpepe]

6573 with asus strix 1080 and CPU score of 5604 with intel 6700k at 4.4 Ghz

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13482479

[Zenny]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13478410

Overall - 7389
GPU - 7831
CPU - 5600

6700k 4.6 Ghz
1080 2050 Mhz

[DeltrusDisc]

Upgraded to Windows 10 today. lol

Ran Timespy...

i7-5820k@4.2GHz (or is it 4.3?)
eVGA GTX 970 SSC (old one with half a Gig or so of slow VRAM)

Somehow my score is unverifiable because the time measurement data was unavailable. -.-

3875 overall.
GPU score 3612
CPU score 6608

Firenerd worked flawlessly and was a valid score.

[Cilraaz]

I guess my CPU is finally starting to hold me back...

i5 2500k @ 4.6GHz
Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 @~2060/2200MHz

Overall: 5300
GPU: 6119
CPU: 3015
Link

[Fascinate]

I guess my CPU is finally starting to hold me back...

i5 2500k @ 4.6GHz
Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 @~2060/2200MHz

Overall: 5300
GPU: 6119
CPU: 3015
Link

Not sure if srs or not lol.

Dont compare to i7's of course they will blow you away in benchmarks, stock clocked 660k is barely ahead of you:
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/63476

Pretty darn good for a 5+ year old cpu

[Vash The Stampede]

Not sure if srs or not lol.

Dont compare to i7's of course they will blow you away in benchmarks, stock clocked 660k is barely ahead of you:
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/63476

Pretty darn good for a 5+ year old cpu

I don't see 6600K's getting any better scores than that. Even if i7's or X99 CPUs did get much better scores, would this transition well into games? So far most games care little about multiple core CPU's or hyperthreading.

[Cilraaz]

Not sure if srs or not lol.

Dont compare to i7's of course they will blow you away in benchmarks, stock clocked 660k is barely ahead of you:
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/63476

Pretty darn good for a 5+ year old cpu

The stock clocked 6600k is 800MHz below my 2500k and received a 20% higher CPU score. Overclock the 6600k and that gap widens further. The only reason the scores are close is because this is a non-OC 1070 vs one with a small GPU core overclock and 10% memory overclock.

It's not bad for a 5 year old CPU, but it is starting to show its age.

[Fascinate]

The stock clocked 6600k is 800MHz below my 2500k and received a 20% higher CPU score. Overclock the 6600k and that gap widens further. The only reason the scores are close is because this is a non-OC 1070 vs one with a small GPU core overclock and 10% memory overclock.

It's not bad for a 5 year old CPU, but it is starting to show its age.

Of course but its also FIVE years old+ lol. I think you are trying to talk yourself into an upgrade based on a benchmark, i am here so you dont : )