So about that whole "no one's gonna have dozens of people report them for no reason whatsoever like Asmongold did" I kept seeing yesterday...lul.
Maybe by this time next week, there will either be GMs in place to actually review these reports before the ban/silence hammer is swung (as was originally advertised), or they pull the plug on this system.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/lie
http://definitions.uslegal.com/l/lie-by-omission/something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture
convey a false impression.
Even if you think lying by omission isn't lying, that's not actually a fact.
You also seem to think that a duration of penalty is the main part in this case. When the "temporary" one can even last just as long as the real one, being practically identical in some cases. Who knows if the investigation takes 24h+ in some cases?
I haven't followed it entirely but the essence of what i've seen about this on twitter is that the guy got a bunch of people to see if they could report him and get him silenced, and it worked.
It brought the issue of "guilty before proven innocent" to the front, where this new system appears to silence you IMMEDIATELY and leave you silenced pending any reviews that they say (there's no proof anyone reviews any of these at this point, and given the outcome of this example, either someone didn't do their job, or it was not reviewed) happen into the report, before either upholding the punishment/silence, or revoking it.
If this is the case, then it is a terrible tool. It will literally cause people to stay out of general and trade channels for fear of assholes being in a mood or wanting to grief others because they get a kick out of it.
What's worse is that Lore has been defending it and essentially blowing off all critiques of it claiming it cannot be abused, despite the fact that it has been.
Lying by omission is only mentioned in Legal terms, not in definition of the word of Lie ; Except for one paragraph, in one line, out of all possible definitions, in only that site. Not in the Oxford Dictionary, none the less.
You'd also be wise to note that Lie requires intent. If you prove that they intentionally gave the false impression, then they have lied to you.
Otherwise, it's not an actual lie.
And, thoose are also synonyms.
And whilst your concern for it being up, is valid - The alternative would leave with people being able to keep spamming.
The system has a intended function, and Asmongold was leveled with a Silence penalty, for knowingly abusing the system.
Moose guy's was lifted, Asmongolds was not.
Also, again, the Silence penalty != being Squelched. Squelch lasts until the investigation is complete, the Silence penalty can be a lot longer, and presumably, above the case of 1 instance of Silencing, is. (as in, 48 Hours, is not a very likely amount of time to wait for a GM to investigate)
Last edited by mmoc411114546c; 2016-07-21 at 12:39 PM.
I honestly cannot believe after all of this there are STILL people in favor of this system.
Stop droning and open your eyes.
Sure any feature can but this feature is highly abuseable, nowhere near what they pretended it was and basically gives certain people way too much power. Instead of helping with flaming and trolling, it will make it easier.
- - - Updated - - -
There's people who love censorship, quite a few of them. They don't like opinions or world views that differ from their own much less "disagreement". You see this in online discourse where disagreeing with people on any topic increasingly devolves into them accusing anyone who doesn't agree to be "trolls" who "disrupt the discussion i.e their echo chamber. They do not like to be challenged on topics, any topics really.
Agreed. It is obviously overly abusable right now. Blizzard simply underestimated the toxicity of the community which is fair. But we play a game now where people are more interested in finding ways to punish people rather than rewarding and connecting with them. Most sane people would have seen it. But.. it really isn't that odd for people in a high management position (like devs) to honestly have no clue about what is going on in their organization because everyone acts and practices differently when they are around.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
First part isn't a retort at all. In fact it only makes the system worse. As it gives the wrong people way too much power. The second part could be seen as one but really isn't. Blizzard isn't checking these messages, they're not reviewing them as it would produce a HUGE work load and it shows. Which means the chances for you to suffer repercursions are rather low, especially if you get a bunch of others in on it and even if the person who got hammered by you manages to actually run down Blizzard, get a proper response, manages them to finally do a manual review and so on you can go "whoops, we all did it in good faith!".
That is if that person will even go through all of that, many people WONT. They will simply suffer that silence and never do anything about it. The system doesn't do what it's supposed to do and even if it would, it's a terrible idea to begin with.
This is the main tweet that i saw, he has subsequent ones underneath and throughout
https://twitter.com/devolore/status/752962622962532352
1. you can't silence for abusing because it is subjective what people find offensive
2. The main point is you can get silenced without investigation.
3. How hard is it to find the ignore button ? it is there to mute people you find offensive
This silence system was clearly not well thought out.
1. It is easy to silence people wrongly.
2. Too much work for GM's
Just disable it already...
Thanks.
LOL, it starts right from the first tweet:
"yo: there's still an investigation when you get reported, the new silence penalty doesn't mean some multiboxer can insta-silence you" --- Not true. The new silence DOES mean that some multiboxer can insta-silence you.
---
Ha-ha, it continues:
https://twitter.com/devolore/status/752965839192666112
"as mentioned in the blog, investigation is first." --- Not true, investigation is second.