Originally Posted by
GoblinP
But the problem is, the US has two goals, one, get rid of Assad, two, get rid of ISIS/avoid a Libya.
Those goals are not mutually compatible.
Absent a US ground force, those things are not mutually compatible.
Getting rid of Assad will collapse Syria, and be a cluster fuck of untold proportions.
To avoid accidents - This incident, seems like a very orchestrated 'accident' -
Sure - Russia should be nice and but out, but they wont, and that's life.
Which would be monumentally stupid.
What would Clinton's policy be? how would it be implemented? What would the outcomes be?
What would the price tag be?
Because to be clear, the only policy proposal I have heard from Clinton is, enforcing a No fly over parts of Syria.
Which would be awesome, because it would in no way be a violation of Syrian Sovereignty, it would risk war no way when the Syrians shoot down some of those Aircraft illegally patrolling its airspace, and it would be awesome to see Russia not give a fuck about the No fly and then that would be awesome.
And for what? - Well if done without opposition (or rather elimination of the Syrian opposition) absent ground forces it would only be a new Libya.
Because Libya was such a resounding success.