Mass shooting Olympia shopping center in Munich, Germany.

[Noradin]

They still get to decide who is chinese or not. You know, English it not the language in China.

They get to decide the legal definition of being a Chinese citizen, they do not get to decide whom English speaking people call Chinese in English.

[XxStavXx]

No it's just it rarely proves worthwhile to engage with alt accounts that have already gotten themselves banned for being mental somewhere along the lines.

woah that is huge assumption to make, so no one can be new to the forum, everyone must be an alt of a previously banned member?

please such a negative outlook is not healthy. anyway not going to waste my time i came here to discuss the thread topic not be bombarded by negative comments about how many posts i have lol jeez.

[Noradin]

Well then you need to reassess what your definition of right wing is.

Last time i checked, socialism and open border multiculturalism were left wing policies.

Like i said a few posts ago, she is a fucked up mixed bag of socialist nationalism. Similar to Hitler, but without the racism.

You really need to look up the international definitions of "left" and "right" because this here is an international forum, not an US American one and you seem to lack insight of what those words mean.

[Fojos]

They get to decide the legal definition of being a Chinese citizen, they do not get to decide whom English speaking people call Chinese in English.

What people in English call it is not relevant, because this is not a question of semantics.

[Deleted]

Source?
Isn't it the other side that keeps yelling people need to toughen up and grow a skin?

When it's about imaginary abuse or idiotic made-up problems (all the "this <insert excuse> offends me, boohoo" BS), yes. Not when it's about genuine abuse; instead that's where the liberal side always comes to the support of the abuser (unless he/she is white and the victim is non-white).

[Againstterrorism]

You really need to look up the international definitions of "left" and "right" because this here is an international forum, not an US American one and you seem to lack insight of what those words mean.

I dont come from America.

Poooof.....


Which is the sound of your point flying right out the window.

[Fojos]

What exactly makes her a socialist?
And why is aid to refugees a left wing policy?

Because taking refugeees into the country instead of helping them at place is based on the liberal left definition of open borders. It's not the question of helping refugees or not, but about the the methods of doing it.

[Dextroden]

Because taking refugeees into the country instead of helping them at place is based on the liberal left definition of open borders. It's not the question of helping refugees or not, but about the the methods of doing it.

Especially bringing them in to the point where foreign aid ends up being slashed to take care of far, FAR less people than sending aid to the camps.

But, eyyy. You (Not YOU, Fojos) helped a fraction of people, invited in a bunch of derelicts to abuse the scenario and blamed it going south on the right wing. Good job.

[Againstterrorism]

Especially bringing them in to the point where foreign aid ends up being slashed to take care of far, FAR less people than sending aid to the camps.

But, eyyy. You (Not YOU, Fojos) helped a fraction of people, invited in a bunch of derelicts to abuse the scenario and blamed it going south on the right wing. Good job.

Which the Left Wing has ALWAYS done.

They blame their own failed ideaologies on the right.

The Left are irresponsible and cowardly. Two things i dont want to be associated with.

[Deleted]

I'm talking about this account.
What exactly makes her a socialist?
And why is aid to refugees a left wing policy?

Aiding others isn't tied to the left or the right. But there's a difference in methods. And shitting on your own people in favor of exotic troublemakers while pretending to be a good person tends to be very much a Left-wing trait. "That poor fox is cold and hungry, let's let him inside the warm chicken house."

[Renyo]

Use your brain.

Merkels state controlled media will NEVER allow this incident to be viewed as the fault of multiculturalism.

Especially immediately after Brexit.

It would be the end of her, and most likely will go on to spell the death of the EU.

That is a conspiracy theory. You know we had the axe attack by an Islamist extremist just a few days ago?

[Againstterrorism]

That is a conspiracy theory. You know we had the axe attack by an Islamist extremist just a few days ago?

Its not conspiracy theory to claim that STATE media supports the state.

Very, very, very far away from a conspiracy theory.

[Deleted]

That is a conspiracy theory. You know we had the axe attack by an Islamist extremist just a few days ago?

classic!
Accusing the "leftist cucks" of twisting news to "their" agenda while doing exactly the same but to a further extent.

- - - Updated - - -

Its not conspiracy theory to claim that STATE media supports the state.

Very, very, very far away from a conspiracy theory.

well unfortunatley for you the private media reports the same story

[Mormolyce]

The Australian outcome disagrees, you're also excluding from the get go all ways in which this could be made to work. Mostly because of ideological reasons.

Oh f* off. My mother is a migrant herself. I'm not blaming all migrants. This is inherently dishonest and a very obvious attempt at slander. I'm blaming certain groups and certain types of immigrants whom a country is better off. Immigrants who do not have a job before they enter a country or in short order, are a drain on resources. Immigrants whom tend to dominate the crime statistics are NOT beneficial and never will be.

When my mother's parents came here they already had jobs, they didn't get any aid in integrating but did so themselves. It's a huge and very important difference one has to always remember. The motivation and attitude of people aswell as their qualifications. Otherwise you end up opening the door for abuse of the welfare system and to attract the bottom feeders of any group who exist aplenty and most everyone is happy to dump on someone else.

Once again with the generalization. Please do tell me how an immigrant from Norway is in any kind of way relatable to let's say, one from Somalia. Stop throwing them together, it's dishonest. You also chose an arbitary starting point in time here. Ignoring how failed the immigration policies of the past are who saw millions move into Europe who had neither the education nor IQ to ever realistically benefit the countries they moved into and who would've always ended up a drain on society.

This obviously doesn't mean it will end criminality or terror attacks but it will massively cut down on them. You'll always have the usual crazy going off the short end or fingy mc fingers waiting to mug someone. But the numbers will be vastly lower across the board. And you will lose the ideological and cultural component currently leading to disaster in Europe, which is on fast track to emulate the Kosovo or Lebanon outcome.

Citation needed. Then again, it's not about closing borders in general, stop pretending this is a black and white issue. It's about clamping down in certain groups, making sure people who inherently aren't beneficial to the society taking them in and so on are better vetted and not supported through welfare and other means. Forcing many of them to return on their own as they couldn't sustain themselves in Europe.

Australian outcome? You know, a quarter of Australians are first generation immigrants and a further 43% are second (children of immigrants, ie have at least one parent born overseas). So actually non-immigrant and non-children of immigrants are the minority. Incidentally my mother was born in Scotland so I'm second generation too. So you and me - same boat!

Like most Western countries Australia has a pretty low refugee intake, though it is one of the highest in the world in terms of resettlement of refugees.

So I assume what you really mean is immigration of certain groups of people. Like how Sweden is okay but Somalia is bad. So could you provide me with a list of all the countries who shouldn't be allowed to immigrate into Europe?

But oh wait, what about those dastardly Somalians who were born second generation in Sweden? They're part of that scary group of second generation immigrants who you're afraid are full of terrorists, they aren't REAL Swedes. Even though they are Swedes.

And what about white people of British heritage born in Somalia?

So yeah, scrap that list of nations, what I really need you to do is provide me with your list of ethnic groups that you'd like banned from entering Europe. And your plan for identifying them at the borders. Maybe look at how big their noses are?

[Againstterrorism]

classic!
Accusing the "leftist cucks" of twisting news to "their" agenda while doing exactly the same but to a further extent.

- - - Updated - - -



well unfortunatley for you the private media reports the same story

No they didnt.

They reported him of shouting alluha akhbar.

Something the state media did not accuse him of doing.

The state media also claimed he was native German, whilst conveniently leaving out the fact he was a second generation of Islamic descent.

[May90]

Yet isn't interesting that when a liberal or minority or Muslim commit a crime, it is never because of mental illness? Mental illness is reserved for when a conservative or white or Christian commit such crimes.

It is just a usual double standard. It is the same as pro-communists say that every problem in a capitalist state is because of capitalism, but when the problem is in a communist state, it is because communism wasn't built right. People tend to think like that, when they pick a side. "Us vs them" mentality.

Which the Left Wing has ALWAYS done.

They blame their own failed ideaologies on the right.

The Left are irresponsible and cowardly. Two things i dont want to be associated with.

And here is an illustration!

[Chrysia]

No they didnt.

They reported him of shouting alluha akhbar.

Something the state media did not accuse him of doing.

The state media also claimed he was native German, whilst conveniently leaving out the fact he was a second generation of Islamic descent.

Source for anyone besides CNN reporting this? That's literally the only source I've seen for this claim.

[ranzino]

No they didnt.

They reported him of shouting alluha akhbar.

Something the state media did not accuse him of doing.

The state media also claimed he was native German, whilst conveniently leaving out the fact he was a second generation of Islamic descent.

Who is "they" ?

And if his parents were naturalized before his birth, he was always a "native German".

[Againstterrorism]

Who is "they" ?

And if his parents were naturalized before his birth, he was always a "native German".

Get real.

Second, third, fourth, fifth and higher can be purists to their roots.

Calling someone a native doesnt mean their not a purist to their roots.

[NYC17]

No they didnt.

They reported him of shouting alluha akhbar.

Something the state media did not accuse him of doing.

The state media also claimed he was native German, whilst conveniently leaving out the fact he was a second generation of Islamic descent.

He self identified as a German. He corrected someone, in video, who called him a foreigner. You seem to be desperately clinging to figments of your imagination. Your time may be better served trying to figure out why you're doing that.

- - - Updated - - -

Source for anyone besides CNN reporting this? That's literally the only source I've seen for this claim.

That whole account seems odd to me. It's based off of a supposed eyewitness who claimed he came out of a bathroom and started killing children while saying it.