One day I look forward to seeing full grown adults realize that their averse reactions to levity and positive/contemplative expressions of emotion are a cry for therapy.
I remember watching a youtube series a long time ago called "the security cam guy" or something along the lines of that.
His joke was he just walked up to people and recorded them, most of the reactions were usually boring, but a lot of them ended up being funny/ridiculous. People were questioning the legality of it all. I ended up doing some research on it and it turns out, recording someone in a public place is completely legal because there's no implication of privacy. I don't even think you could tell someone to stop as long as you were in a public place. But I'm sure this falls into this category.
And as far as the pedophile claim goes, some people may use the underage people to "get off" but the site doesn't base it's content off of sexually explicit content.
There's actually sites that sell DVD's of photographs and videos of nudist colonies,and a lot include children , but because they claim that the material is not made for porn it ends up being legal.
As far as using sex appeal, I don't imagine that would hold any grounds legally, because a lot of companies use sex appeal to sell products. And if these guy were to be punished on those grounds that means that Victora's Secret ads would also be considered pornographic materials.
From what I understand they are standing right on the edge of legal and illegal. Although morally it's a pretty shady thing to do I'm my opinion, legally there's no law that's being infringed upon currently.
I don't have a problem with that. If you are on a beach wearing a bikini for example, people can see you, if you want that or not because the beach is a public area. If someone takes a picture of you and puts it online, then more people can see you but it is still the same thing.
Who decided that any of the photos were 'illegal'? I haven't seen that finding by a court anywhere, can you provide this?
If you are concerned about what people are being photographed wearing perhaps you should seek those people out and complain to them.
I am curious, is it now a crime to take pictures in public of other people? If so, please provide the case law for this.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
There's nothing wrong with making jokes about rape. You can make jokes about anything in life. In fact, there tends to be more jokes about the more terrible things in life.
As for this though as others have mentioned, in a public place you can't really expect to be assured privacy. Some people may well be targeting individuals specifically for a picture of a certain nature. Can you imagine families having to ask the perhaps hundreds or thousands of people on a beach if they're allowed to take their picture as they want to remember their kids playing on the beach. So asking for permission will never be a thing required for taking pictures.
If people objected to it so much they should be challenging lawmakers on this rather than Twitter, what happens on Twitter is going to be mild compared to other environments where worse will happen. Getting mad about pictures on twitter is like getting mad at playboy for the kind of porn they used to do, it gets a lot more fucked up on the internet once you push just a little further in.
Trying to protect those actually being abused and suffering as a result would be far more noble. It's surprising how little feminists actually do trying to fight the stuff that is really messed up, the child porn, and then again things like the peadophile rings we've had exposed here in the UK in towns like Rotherham.
Surprising to be honest.
I mean Twitter is fine with ISIS accounts and such, but tend to be pretty strongarmed when it comes to feminist outrage.
Surprising indeed.
Wait, how do we even know this supposed website/hashtag even exists? No one has posted either one, so for all we know, we've been discussing something a bored guardian journalist made up out of boredom.