Machete attack Reutlingen, Germany

[lonely zergling]

Point where I said "it's okay! kill people over arguments best idea ever!".

I just find it amusing that in the rush to go to "IT WAS ISIS FOR SURE THIS TIME, SYRIAN GUY" people ignore the actual words in the article. Again.

No one said it was ISIS. IT was a fucking police known asylum seeker.

[Deleted]

Not to detract from the "ha, it was a muslim immigrant this time!" smugness, but the article also specifically states he attacked someone after arguing with her, which leans more toward "anger issues" than anything else.

But on this case, he should be sent to whatever nation accepts "modern barbarians". Attacking someone with a machete is so primitive in 21st Century Europe.

This should be the example of why Europe must be more careful with the migrants. Screw islamic terrorism, clashing civilizations is way worse.

[Deleted]

Not to detract from the "ha, it was a muslim immigrant this time!" smugness, but the article also specifically states he attacked someone after arguing with her, which leans more toward "anger issues" than anything else.

Those are some pretty substantial issues he has if he argued with one person and attacked three.

[Miyagie]

But on this case, he should be sent to whatever nation accepts "modern barbarians". Attacking someone with a machete is so primitive in 21st Century Europe.

Its germany and hes 21, a child in the eyes of the law so he wont get punished hard maybe 1 year jail.

[Vanyali]

Those are some pretty substantial issues he has if he argued with one person and attacked three.

Ever been around someone with major anger issues?

Mad at person X, person Y does something minorly annoying --> go off on them.

Except, of course, he's armed with a machete in this case, and most people aren't in day to day life.

[Deleted]

Those are some pretty substantial issues he has if he argued with one person and attacked three.

With a machete.

[Super Friendly Kitty Cat]

Not to detract from the "ha, it was a muslim immigrant this time!" smugness, but the article also specifically states he attacked someone after arguing with her, which leans more toward "anger issues" than anything else.

This time....

Yes, let's ignore the fact it's literally every time.

[Deleted]

Ever been around someone with major anger issues?

Yes. They don't attack people with machetes.

[Vanyali]

This time....

Yes, let's ignore the fact it's literally every time.

"Literally every other time" has been someone born in the area which, by definition, means they're actually not immigrants.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes. They don't attack people with machetes.

No, they just use their fists, or a crowbar, or whatever else they happen to have.

Guy had a machete, for whatever goddamn reason.

[Deleted]

This time....

Yes, let's ignore the fact it's literally every time.

Except this is not a case of terrorism but of clashing civilizations.

No, they just use their fists, or a crowbar, or whatever else they happen to have.

Guy had a machete, for whatever goddamn reason.

But that's the point. He had a machete because machetes are commonly accepted as weapons for whatever reason in the Middle East/Africa/Asia. Europeans learned to deal with anger issues in other ways.

[JohnBrown1917]

Take a wild guess as to what the motive was.

Just like you guys did with the recent mall Shooting?

[lonely zergling]

"Literally every other time" has been someone born in the area which, by definition, means they're actually not immigrants.

Dont forget the AXE guy. (confirmed terrorist attack)

[Kallisto]

"Literally every other time" has been someone born in the area which, by definition, means they're actually not immigrants.

I don't think you understand. For some people you could have had family here 300-400 years. But if you dare even look like you might be muslim you're part of that muslim hive mind and an evil immigrant by default.

[Vanyali]

But that's the point. He had a machete because machetes are commonly accepted as weapons for whatever reason in the Middle East/Africa/Asia. Europeans learned to deal with anger issues in other ways.

You're right.

We use crowbars and guns, apparently. Much more civilized.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/video/watc...d-rage-attack/
http://www.newson6.com/Clip/7494162/...-car-collision
http://www.sfgate.com/weird/article/...ge-7947795.php

And yes, people die as a result

http://news3lv.com/news/local/road-r...-craig-and-5th
http://www.tampabay.com/news/publics...identw/2279625
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-36305405

[JohnBrown1917]

Dont forget the AXE guy. (confirmed terrorist attack)

So we got 1 terror attack, 1 edgy teen doing what very edgy and depressed teens dream of doing, and this one???

[Brexitftw123]

Dear people of The United Kingdom,

Thank fuck vote leave won so we don't have to fear this shit.

Sincerely,

Humble Englishman

[lonely zergling]

So we got 1 terror attack, 1 edgy teen doing what very edgy and depressed teens dream of doing, and this one???

And 3-4 were prevented with luck and good police work.

[Deleted]

You're right.

We use crowbars and guns, apparently. Much more civilized.

Europeans walk with machetes on the street? It is result of clashing civilizations, there is not other way around.

[lonely zergling]

Europeans walk with machetes on the street? It is result of clashing civilizations, there is not other way around.

Gordon Freeman walks around with a Crowbar.

[Vanyali]

Europeans walk with machetes on the street? It is result of clashing civilizations, there is not other way around.

tell me: why are knives more civilized when the last link was someone in England stabbing someone to death?

was he clashing civilizations, or are people with severe anger issues going to use anything at hand because that's kinda their schtick?



edit: i just find it really weird that your stance seems to be "he used a MACHETE. the western weapon of choice is a KNIFE when you have anger issues. such a culture clash".