I'm afraid you misunderstood my point. The only thing I really see you've done as contribution per se is that list. Yet you've said it's not really designed for reasons to vote for or against someone. However, if you consistently score someone as negative who is working on trying to put forth contributive effort that would lead me to strongly believe you have an ulterior motive. Especially if you also take as a contribution point "Voting so and so because they're a lurker" as a positive.
To me that means you want to inflate the value of someone, in this case yourself, trying to also lurk in the shadows and throw out vague text and claim it is 'contribution' while at the same taking someone who is spending a lot of time analyzing and providing reasons and insight as to what they see (even if they are potentially making mistakes while doing it due to being new) and scoring it negative. That seems VERY scummy to me. The fact that you also seem to resort to petty insults when confronted reminds me of how you acted quite a bit in the last game you provided lists on... and were scum in.
So for me, that's a lot of very negative reads I'm getting on you, and the more I'm thinking on it the less I can recollect anything that would make me think otherwise. Even an initial vote on Allowyn could be simply a ploy to activate an ability for mafia, trigger a win condition of yours, or to just try and buy yourself towncred by basically being a cold-hearted player and lynching a teammate of yours that is lurking. And if that vote on Allowyn you did WAS for that reason... DAMN that is cold but also a seriously impressive gambit.
A better way of reading my statement is: Your lists are a lack of contribution to me because A) You are going to great lengths to try and showcase to everyone that these lists are your contribution. but... B) You admit you, yourself, designed them to not really be a reason to vote for or against someone they're just an arbitrarily scaled scoreboard. So either you are intending them to be a source of contribution and a reason to vote or not vote on someone, or they aren't intended to be contribution in which case, do SOMETHING.
Reviewed all 38 of your posts that exist up to #773... Of them I'd rate 6 as "contribution". Even by your "scale". You even admit that you should spend less time on the list and more time playing the game. And no I'm not going to tell you how to improve your lists, that's not my job. You want them better, make them better yourself. I can tell you that the biggest flaw I see is that you control the scoring and tweak it as you deem fit without actually making it a concrete, static system that anyone else could duplicate your results with.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah... I fell asleep and set and an alarm for 11am. Got up and was perusing posts forward from my last post, at 11:05 and formulating a response as I went... Unfortunately I got to the end of the posts and found a hammer had gone out. So I finished my thoughts, stuck em in my QT as a personal note and then posted it D4.
I'm not sure now if I believe the Doc claim or not. I still don't trust Kryllian, and there's been lots of good reasons said as to how if they are a Doc they've done a gross misplay. So if the best vote for the day is to end up attempting to Lynch Kryllian to prove if he's red or blue... So be it. Even with everything I read, ending D3 I wouldn't have done an Unvote so, it is why I would be willing to vote on him... But not until closer to day end, I prefer to reserve the right to review my thoughts and see other's opinions and how things shake out before voting on him. Especially since I'm having serious issues believing Virothe isn't scum right now.
I would not have voted on Cruelle, as I said once I thought about how forcefully they were pushing for a lynch of themselves ON a certain day it started to seem really suspicious that they get lynched on THAT particular day.
- - - Updated - - -
Hmm I guess pointing out a flaw I see in @Virothe's list is actually giving advice on how to improve it. Mea culpa.