If I filmed someone giving a report on WWII, then edited it to make it sound like the person supports Hitler's extermination of the Jewish people, then presented it to the public that this person is racist, I could easily be sued for defamation. It wouldnt be parody, it would cause problems for that person's public image, it's defamation. Same situation happened to Planned Parenthood.
- - - Updated - - -
Well obviously in a country that gives rapists 3 months anything could happen, but I would hope the US judicial system does not fail in this case.
Nope, we saw the unedited hour and a half footage and the 9 minute video. The 9 minute video had none of the mentionings by the PP representative that they could not sell fetal tissue. But it magically had the part where she said she wanted a Lamborghini, like it was her trying to say that she wanted a Lamborghini for fetal tissue. The 9 minute video tried to show that they were haggling for prices of tissue but it didn't show that literally right after they said a potential price of what it COULD BE WORTH, that the PP representative said that they, again, COULD NOT SELL FETAL TISSUE.
So yes, WE DO KNOW THAT THEY DOCTORED A VIDEO to make it look like Planned Parenthood was selling fetal tissue and yet, a dozen or more state investigations and federal investigations showed there was no selling of fetal tissue or anything else.
How about, mental testing to make sure they aren't crazy or have PTSD. Closing the Gun Show loophole that is in 33 states the don't require background checks for personal sales? Where gun retailers "claim" they are personal sellers to get rid of inventory and to make a few bucks. But selling 500 AR-15s in a month, is not a personal seller. You know, what even 90% of gun owners want?
STAHP SHITTING ON MUH FREEDUMBS ORBY STAHP IT NAO.
I mean, while your ideas are semi worthy of being glanced, we must adhere to an ancient piece of paper wrote by a group of people who magically believed they could see the future for our God Blessed And Great Union The United States Of By God America(tm) requiring average citizens to own firearms with little to no regulations because Reasons.
I know all the conservatives have said that the whole "shall not be infringed" bullshit is the only thing that matters and that they should have tactical fucking nukes. But the SCOTUS has ruled that reasonable restrictions like those I listed are ok. Otherwise they wouldn't have allowed other restrictions like gun bans like banning fully automatic weapons or making them EXTREMELY hard to get.
MY X/Y POKEMON FRIEND CODE: 1418-7279-9541 In Game Name: Michael__
You have to show that someone was endangered, not the possibility that it could happen. That is why she won't be prosecuted, because you have to show wrongdoing. Since there was no wrongdoing, there was no charges. She did give all of the ones that were MARKED PROPERLY that they were classified. The ones that weren't, from the sender, were overlooked and I am sure you have done something similar before.
- - - Updated - - -
Because what he was saying was fucking sarcasm, but you apparently didn't fucking catch it.
I literally have no idea what this means.
__________________________________
As for non-religious objections to abortion: I've personally never encountered one. I'll admit the possibility that they exist, but I have to say whenever I've encountered someone objecting to abortion it's been entirely on religious grounds. I'd be interested to hear some.
As for being "anti-religion": perhaps those who make that accusation of me haven't looked at my profile info.
I think belief is all very well; religious fundamentalism being set forth into the realm of supposedly secular laws is what I chiefly object to.
And frankly, I don't think men should be a part of the abortion debate at all. Let women decide this among themselves, I say. We men don't have wombs, and it is (in my view) the height of presumption to insert ourselves into this debate.
Corruption was exposed, justice was served, it was a good day.
Originally Posted by spinner981