Just going to drop this here because I'm bored ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality
Everything is wealth redistribution. Especially when others are paying for your method of production.
I was a democrat this time last year. I now throw my lot in with Republicans. Most attractive feature of the party is that feelings aren't put first when conversations happen or decisions are made. To add to that I now own a construction company, republican policies benefit me and my workers more. Had a cool conversation with my company lawyer about which pres would help us out more and it was overwhelmingly Trump. So theres that
My views go to both sides as a matter of pragmatism but I've reliably voted Democratic because I consider them to be better on all of my secondary issues. Which sucks. I'd love an honest to goodness Left-Libertarian party, but I'm not sure anything other than an outright depression and/or civil revolt will kill capitalism in my lifetime(also not advocating for either of those, I'm squarely in the muddle-along and try to do as little harm as possible camp).
SJW (social justice warrior) mentality is the prioritization of feelings and anecdotal evidence over facts and statistics.
I think what he is saying that while both parties may be emotionally driven, sjw mentality only exists within the democratic party, though a sub-group.
To counter that, the alt-right (nationalist) only exist in the right, which is half emotionally drive and half, mislead, statistic based. It is a way to balance the pedestal with extremism on both side.
Labeling your self as anything is usually very wrong.
Why?
Because when you label yourself as, i.e. "Democrat", you sort of accept EVERYTHING that defines that. And usually, only the parts are moral, justful and fair.
Why can't people take the best from all and not label themselves at all?
They are absolutely tax cuts for the rich, with minor tax cuts thrown in for everybody else to make it more palatable. Capital gains and dividends have been cut in half between Reagan and Bush. Phase-in's for developers have become ridiculous considering how much they're getting back in both potential capitol and using them as buffers against LTCG to avoid AMT's.
Basically, supply-side economics posits something that seams reasonable until you realize it's simply a way for the wealthy to horde more wealth. Do you know what actually spurs economic growth? Giving raises to the poor and middle class, who will immediately spend that money. Money moving for goods and services creates economic growth. Money moving between funds absolutely does not.
He's probably referring to how the dnc does stuff like have mothers of criminals killed by cops on at the dnc to pander to BLM. Even though stats show blacks r not being singled out or executed by cops and if anything blacks have been hurt the worst out of anyone economically after 8 years of a democrat in office.
-=Z=- Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek! -=Z=-
https://bdsmovement.net/
I 100% agree. I feel the problem with it is people lean towards a "clan" mentality to be with their group. With that they accept all of the burdens of the group you may not agree with.
Hell, I was talking to a guy who called himself a libertarian who believed it was not right that the government cannot issue a blind person a driver's license because it impede's the person's rights. Or green party members who think half of the US will be under water in 3 years. Sometimes the two big parties are appealing because those off-opinions are less vocal considering the amount of less absurd voices in the group
- - - Updated - - -
They'll change the name to look less crazy, as most cults do.
Neither. A two party system is destructive and stupid. As if we were not polarized enough already.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
Well, if this is the case, then pretty much every political party in the world has this mentality, since it is very hard to reach to people without resorting to appeal to feelings/emotion. Few people are interested in actual statistics, most want to hear how some project implemented would make them happier and wealthier.
Well, RNC had a mother of a person killed in Benghazi go on stage for emotional effect to blame Hillary. Or this weird guy asking the god to support Trump. Again, it is politics, all parties do this kind of thing.