I think it's abhorrently unethical of him to dangle it around AFTER the nominees have been set rather than to just be "out with it" and allow time for both major parties to strategize around whatever information he has.
I think it's abhorrently unethical of him to dangle it around AFTER the nominees have been set rather than to just be "out with it" and allow time for both major parties to strategize around whatever information he has.
I wasn't really trying to argue against the leaks being done by a russian. Its just that was the only link he gave and using it as "evidence" for his claim when it didn't support it at all minus the Hillary said so.
Thanks for the link though. I'll check it out, have some downtime at work.
Last edited by Captain Proton; 2016-07-27 at 04:40 PM.
That's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying, if he has shit on hillary clinton that might get her arrested, then he should drop it and get her arrested before she becomes the democratic nominee. Otherwise he's potentially and inorganically tilting the election in favor of Trump.
Assange always comes off as such a narcissistic, irresponsible, self-righteous and self-aggrandising creep. I've no idea why he is idolised by some on the left. The neither "confirm nor denying" its the Russians is symptomatic of his moral bankruptcy and hypocrisy. Surely the only justification of wanting to leak stuff is because you believe people should be told the truth? Except when it affects his own shady business, of course.
More information to come means he has the information and is releasing it in parts for a reason.
http://www.theverge.com/2016/7/25/12...illary-clinton
This means there's a political agenda behind the timing of its releases. Assange has sit on information before but that was to review and filter parts out it was never because he just got it, the processing of such leaked information also takes time, to assume it is all coincidence one has to be rather naive sorry to say.
So the political agenda of the rapist is more of a concern to you than the political agenda of the politician that lied to you? Again, I keep saying it, it's amazing how many are more concerned with the motives of the leaker, than they are with the facts that prove they were being lied to by the politician.
Is there any truth you could find out about Hillary that would make you think she is dishonest? Or are you just all in, like some sort of cult follower?
Hopefully he will release a bunch of dirt on Trump next. Then perhaps good Presidential candidates like Johnson and Stein will get more media and public attention than they have been getting.