That would eliminate the entire point of PP. You can already get the same treatments, if you can afford it.
- - - Updated - - -
Just to add a tad more accuracy, but it doesn't just go to that. Any funds that are over the amount needed for that year, get rolled over to the next. Their reimbursement didn't just cover the cost of tissue donation, but went to the same financial pool as other donations/funding.
- - - Updated - - -
False equivalency... Trump is running on the platform of overturning Row v Wade. If you think Hillary is doing the same, you are being disengenous at best. Hillary will not defund PP, Trump argues to not just defund, but make abortion illegal.
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Trump is pro-choice and will revert to his stance and do nothing about making abortion illegal.
Hilary is pro-choice too, and doesn't think unborn babies should have any rights at all (even at 39 weeks) watch if interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCgmq0xXPWE ("an unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights... does not sacrifice the woman's right to make decisions")
I am not voting for either of them, and voting for Gary Johnson, who also happens to be pro-choice, but it's ok to disagree with someone and still like them more than the other candidates. Libertarians have a good platform.
MY X/Y POKEMON FRIEND CODE: 1418-7279-9541 In Game Name: Michael__
wait, they had charges dropped against them in TEXAS because they lied about planned parenthood?
nothing to see here
Except they aren't using taxpayer dollars to perform abortions, unless you have proof that their budget illegally uses public funding to pay for abortions rather than that amount going to the myriad of other services they offer (mammograms, std tests, birth control, etc.)
So, I assume you support George Zimmerman in filing suit against NBC for libel?
- - - Updated - - -
Not directly paying for but certainly supporting abortions. Take away all tax payer funding to PP and the number of their offices would likely fall to 25% or less of their current numbers. It's the tax payers money that is supporting these clinics keeping them up and running.
And? Are you insinuating that they should have their public funding revoked because they perform abortions without that funding while using that funding to give much needed medical aid to impoverished people who couldn't afford it otherwise? I mean, if you are a pro-lifer, you sure shitty way of showing it by saying that you'd rather poor people die or suffer from STD's, breast cancer, and birth complications than tolerate that the same people providing those very necessary medical services to poor people also provide abortions without breaking the funding laws.
- - - Updated - - -
You mean the supposedly white latino man who shot Trayvon Martin after getting curb stomped by him? That guy? I mean I wonder why he might file a defamation lawsuit with one of the networks that ran one of the most misrepresented news stories in American history.
Now before you get on me about Zimmerman, no I don't think that he should have been following Trayon and yes I think that his actions directly contributed to causing the violence that resulted in Trayvon Martin's death; however, some paranoid idiot neighborhood watch guy who is probably racist following you does not give you the right o bash his head against the curb, but that's how Trayvon responded to Zimmerman's idiocy thus he gave Zimmerman just cause to shoot him in self-defense.
I'm saying that if tax payer money is needed in some communities it could (and should) be used to fund other clinics/foundations that provide the same services while not providing abortions. Currently tax payer money is subsidizing abortions.
One correction... the supposedly white latino man who shot Trayvon Martin whilegetting curb stomped by him
- - - Updated - - -
Your refusal to give a stance pretty much says it all.
I'll tell you why I'm not giving you a stance.
Because I didn't really pay attention to the Trayvon Martin shit, and from a google search it looks like Zimmerman is suing over what he says is an edited phone call. I'm not about to sink half an hour researching some tangential bullshit because you've got your heart set on this fishing expedition. And what good would it do anyway to find perceived hypocrisy? That's not actually an argument anyway.
On the other hand, I have seen the videos in question here, and I do know that it was deceptively edited.