http://media3.popsugar-assets.com/fi...-beach-her.jpg
Lotta VS models have kids and look banging. But I hear you. Some women just look haggard as hell after kids, but it's a combination of genetics and money.
What a motherfucker.
I mean as long as they both consent and are adults I see nothing wrong with this. Its the same as gay people. We should tolerate both.
Except that there is one significant difference -- inbreeding has been shown to have negative effects that LGBTQ marriages do not have. Setting aside the question of potential grooming and child abuse, the royal families of Europe give us a very clear example of what inbreeding does. That wasn't a random painting I posted, it was an actual portrait.Originally Posted by lonely zergling
With COVID-19 making its impact on our lives, I have decided that I shall hang in there for my remaining days, skip some meals, try to get children to experiment with making henna patterns on their skin, and plant some trees. You know -- live, fast, dye young, and leave a pretty copse. I feel like I may not have that quite right.
Then why do we allow people with hereditary diseases or woman above the age of 40 allow to have children ? Your argument sounds really nazi.
- - - Updated - - -
Whats the difference? Two consenting adults doing things in bedroom that are not considered the norm by most people, we still should respect their right to sexual self determination. As long as they keep it legal (adults, consent etc.) they can do what they want.
We are talking about consenting adults not kids. Would you support to castrate people with hereditary diseases and woman above a certain age too? I mean we need to keep the gene pool clean! MEIN FUEHRER.
If they use protection the problem disappears anyway or if they use the other door.
Both is disgusting for most people but we should respect peoples rights, we should stay out of their bedrooms .
Last edited by lonely zergling; 2016-08-11 at 01:35 PM.