So you have figured out what max tegmark cannot? How about michio kaku?:
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...are-evidence-0
Surely you are a brighter guy than michio kaku.
NO no no no. You can't sit there and say
And then follow it with all that drivel, misconstruing or ignoring sections of what that data means, claiming it might disprove the Copernican foundation, and then say you were not aiming at a geocentric model.Just another attempt from science to write off a creator, nothing will come from this. I am curious tho, what will be the dagger that shows we are the only life in the cosmos? Would a trip to one of jupiters moons be enough?
I find it curious how nowhere is it mentioned in the article that Proxima Centauri is the nearest star to Sol.
How did we go from talking about whether Earth was the center of the universe to whether the universe was created?
The universe may very well have been designed by something, in fact there are some hypothesis that our entire universe is a simulation by some higher beings.
But that's completely irrelevant to the current discussion. One thing is almost certain though, this "creator" assuming it exists, (for while we can theorize on the complexity of the universe we cannot prove the creator) is most certainly unrelated to any Earth religions.
There is physical evidence of Dark matter though, we just can't see it so we don't know what it is. But we know it's there because it affects other stuff gravitationally.
To use an analogy you might understand, it's like hearing a sound but being unable to see what makes that sound.
lmao at two above people:
First guy:
"Who has said there is physical evidence of dark matter"
Second guy"
"There is physical evidence of dark matter tho"
Both are as confident as ever.
Just lol...
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
Who has said I'm a guy?
Point is though, it depends on what you mean of physical evidence. Have we discovered what Dark matter is exactly and how it works, have we observed it through electromagnetic radiation? No. Do we know it's there and how much it affects other stuff? Yes. There have been observations of mysterious matter causing gravitational lensing that we could not identify. And there is some theoretical matter composing 23% or so of all matter in the observable universe. Both are called Dark matter and may be the same.
The thing is, it seems to completely ignore light. Light is electromagnetic radiation, light works in that it is constantly reflected and carries information about what it "touched". However, Dark matter does not reflect any light, therefore we cannot detect it since our eyes work by translating electromagnetic radiation into information to our brains. (And we use instruments converting light we cannot see, such as infrared into light that we can see to detect things that are blue or red shifted.) The CMB was not always Microwaves, once it was normal light we could have been. Imagine the entire universe being red or blue, that how it was at one point. And once day it will stop being microwaves and become radio as the echo becomes longer.
But we've recently detected gravitational waves, perhaps that can be used to show us what Dark matter looks like one day?
Last edited by Gurluas; 2016-08-13 at 05:21 PM.