As I wrote, that's been the minority of X-Men stories, and not even the particularly good ones.
The majority of X-Men stories are superheroics, science fiction and sometimes fantasy. Intent is one thing, execution is quite different.
Tell me how Age of Apocalypse, the Dark Phoenix Saga, House of M, the Phalanx Covenant, Fatal Attractions, Inferno, the X-Men in Australia, Days of Future's Past, Onslaught, Imperial, and most others had anything to do with allegory? They didn't. God Loves Man Kills doesn't make up for the fact that the X-Men are more often than not saving the world from someone looking to wipe it out, or traveling through time, or other planets, other dimensions, than cerebrally examining the place of a minority in an unaccepting society.
Occasional one offs did. But really, they're the exception rather than the rule. I bet you they have more story's about ninjas or Canada or the "Thieves Guild" than they do about social commentary.
DC has a long history of different people taking up the mantle of a hero and Captain America has apparently been a Nazi this whole time so they can do whatever they want now as far as I care. What it comes down to though is as long as the story is compelling I don't care. As long as a character doesn't just walk in and say "Hey guys, I'm <insert race/sex> now!" and everyone carries on as if nothing happened then I'm fine with it.
Signature not found
X-Men is incredibly allegorical, except the vast majority of times it wasn't.
Some world
That hates
And fears
Them
X-Men as allegory has always and will always be bullshit. They are superhero adventurers with a different backstory and origin, the end.
You don't go to a Michael Bay movie expecting an deep exploration of the human condition. And you don't go to super-hero comic books expecting worthwhile insight on the world in which we live. For every one moment of that is fifty moments of well... the Brood or something of that nature.
But anyway time for work. back later.
Let me just explain why alot of these changes are bad.
First; Captain America; Sam has been Captain America before, We have had a Black Captain America before, So why Sam being Cap NOW is drummed up as petty Diversity quotas, especially as it goes against Sam's character. Sam has never enjoyed being a leader, he can step up to the role, but he's a better soldier than a commander. It's also blatant pandering when Misty Knight suddenly has the hots for him, despite barely knowing him and being engaged to Danny Rand.
Second: Thor. Thor is not a title, it's not a power set, it's a person. When Thor has previously had the powers removed or given to people like Eric Masterson. They didn't take up the "Title" of Thor. They BECAME Thor the Thundergod, and in every iteration, like Eric, Have had Thor's godly soul hidden within them. FemThor has none of these ties, she just picked up the Hammer. AND IRONICALLY we have already had "What if Jane foster was Thor" before. She called herself Thordis, and Again, had the trapped soul of Thor within her.
- - - Updated - - -
I mean arguably the most famous writer for X-men, Claremont, Wrote blatant fetish fuel.
has not a dam thing to do with it being a standard straight white dud, I'd be just as ticked if they Replaced Storm with another person even if she was a black Female. Storm is Ororo Munroe....
It has more to do with whatever Character we've grown attached to pushed from the roll we've grown up with them in.
Pretty much. I cringed during Thor because it's so pointless, we've been here before, the pandering is pathetic and the stories are not new or interesting.
People want Thor to be cosmic god fantasy stories, not some whiny bitch beating up absorbing man who absorbed the powers of an internet strawman.
- - - Updated - - -
The ironic fact is the "Steve rodgers was hydra all along" is an interesting arc because.... it's not changed Steve much, he's a good guy who works for an "Ideal" of Hydra that only a cosmic cube girl thought was correct.
Captain America will always be Captain America to me.
If they change it to Froggy America or Sassy African-American America then I'll just ignore it, consider it non-canon and move on with my life.
Stupid shit needs not the time nor energy expended upon it. You express that best by simply not buying into it.
*sigh*
I used to be an avid reader/collector of Marvel comic-books since the mid-70s. I pretty much stopped after it seemed that Marvel was trying to redeem Sabretooth into some hero. (After the Morlock Massacre, he deserved the death penalty.)
But I have to admit that comic books were going down hill since the late 80s. The storylines were just too fucked up. (first time we really get the idea that death isn't permanent was in the amazingly shitty "X-Factor.") They tried...but then the 90s came along and just sucked away. There are few new popular superheroes in the past 15 years, with actual original names and titles. (eg., "Deadpool," "Cable" Gambit)
Today Marvel just connects what is "new" with the old.
The "anchors" were created in the 60s. (Not counting Cap, Namor or the original Human Torch, or any character from the Golden Age)
Then Marvel got even more creative in the 70s...and they went to the wall with just about everything we know today.
The 80s went crazy from the sheer writing endeavors that reinforced characters that were created; e.g., Beta Ray Bill, Venom, Elecktra, She-Hulk, Dazzler, etc.,...(Though I extremely dislike Venom)
The 90s is when the momentum downhill increased, and very much hit or miss. Cable, Deadpool, and even Gambit were ok. But they had the writers and the characters still reflecting from earlier material. The new "Darkhawk" was intriguing at first. But lacked the writing quality to keep any interest. The "Scarlet Spider" reflected back to Spider-Man, but still suffered from sucky writing. "Winter Guard" didn't make the cut because of the poor writing again. "Thunderbolts" did make the grade in a big way. Damn, that was good writing there! And that's what kept that title going strong.
Things just took an embarrassing turn later. Marvel VP Tom Brevoort flat out said that the only thing that spikes sales today is controversy.
I find most of the readership of today's comic-books has rather poor taste, and prefers to support the lack of writing content in favor of this "controversy," which in my opinion is nothing more than flashy political correct bullshit.
But "Hail Hydra" right?
Hollywood and entertainment still believe there's profit to be made in pandering to the lowest common denominator (AKA regressive liberals) because most of them have been conditioned by a consumerist culture.
The problem is, regressives prefer complaining over content they've never even tried over actually trying out said content, and we're finally starting to see it bite the companies in the ass because those who actually consume their content are getting tired of this regressive forced diversity shit.