Yes, but you support him while you admit he needs to do the above. In fact, the above is a list of reasons why there is a never Trump cause. He doesn't need to impress people who will vote for him, while knowing he is the inferior candidate, either. He does not need to sway the "anyone, but Hillary" crowd, they are not asking for better. He has you in the bag, for the same reason I will never vote for him... The differance being, you will never find me saying Hillary needs to start lying more or for the media to stop scrutinizing her.
I don't think he can say anything to sway you... Remember when you said I was flaming you, when I simply repeated that your defense of him was missing the obvious, because that's exactly what he said to those who actually took his word as he said it. That's the differance between never Trump and his remaining support. One considers the History of both candidates, while the other only focuses on one. It's why unlike every other election, the argument of 'they are all the same' doesn't work, even according to Trump. In an actual comparison, something that wouldn't be true for a lot of the GOP candidates during primaries or majority of candidates in history, Hillary is a far better candidate than Trump. So is every candidate in the history of the country.
You got your 'anyone', too bad you didn't ask for 'better, than'.
- - - Updated - - -
What part of the Union should be taxed? Their dues or pension payouts?