Republican Election 2016 - Donald Trump Megathread [OFFICIAL]

[GennGreymane]

So Trump is apologizing for his wording? Now will his fans be mad at him for going PC, and going against "says what he really means" or will they now praise him for regretting not being PC?

[Ausr]

You guys really need to stop responding to people who you know won't take whatever you say seriously. You know Fadeslol is just going to dismiss whatever you say with "whatever, LOL. not true!"

[Fadeslol]

You guys really need to stop responding to people who you know won't take whatever you say seriously. You know Fadeslol is just going to dismiss whatever you say with "whatever, LOL. not true!"

Not really, there is evidence that backs it up.

[Ausr]

Not really, there is evidence that backs it up.

That you dismiss things like that? Ok, thanks for agreeing, I guess.

[Deja Thoris]

Was Iraq War a lie? Yes. Was Gulf of Tonkin a lie? Yes. So how are you going to say shit is a lie, "Tinfoil hat" is real cute, i guess public school taught you that.

Thats a vague statement. You mean the war(s) that republican presidents started? Or are you throwing that at Hilary / Obamas feet?

Heres people smarter and more informed than us saying their piece http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/im...rumpletter.pdf but of course you get all your news and facts from lunaticconspiracies.com don't you?

[Zomis]

Thats a vague statement. You mean the war(s) that republican presidents started? Or are you throwing that at Hilary / Obamas feet?

Heres people smarter and more informed than us saying their piece http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/im...rumpletter.pdf but of course you get all your news and facts from lunaticconspiracies.com don't you?

You mean wars that democrat senators voted for? Including Hillary Clinton.

[Fadeslol]

Thats a vague statement. You mean the war(s) that republican presidents started? Or are you throwing that at Hilary / Obamas feet?

Heres people smarter and more informed than us saying their piece http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/im...rumpletter.pdf but of course you get all your news and facts from lunaticconspiracies.com don't you?

You're 100% right, yes they did and our govt are known liars. Guess what? i don't care for any republication or democrat to back trump. Just like with Bernie and the Democrats wanting Hillary, the Republications don't want Trump. This 2 party system is cancer. We need more than 2 people on the ticket. Awww is that what they teach you? conspiracy theories? something that was made up by the CIA.

- - - Updated - - -

That you dismiss things like that? Ok, thanks for agreeing, I guess.

It's proven we support the rebels in Syria, we know some of the groups are ISIS. We want Assad out of power.

[Orbitus]

You mean wars that democrat senators voted for? Including Hillary Clinton.

Based on lies from the Bush Administration? Sure. Anyone would vote for that after the biggest terrorist attack in the world just happened and you are lied to BLATANTLY by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney said.

[Fadeslol]

Based on lies from the Bush Administration? Sure. Anyone would vote for that after the biggest terrorist attack in the world just happened and you are lied to BLATANTLY by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney said.

ding ding ding, "Based on the lies from the Bush Administration" That's why our govt are known liars, plus other instances.

Oh look we agree.

[Pangean]

These groups are 1) defecting towards ISIS or 2) Already part of ISIS. We do not know who they are. We just want Assad out of power.

https://www.rt.com/usa/171680-ron-pa...syrian-rebels/

Go ahead and provide evidence of that claim. A non-russian propaganda, non conspiracy theory cite will suffice. It's not to say that some rebel groups do not shift alliances but to claim that they all are is just nonsense. Yet again.

And then you claim you do not know who they are, but the groups you don't know, are defecting towards ISIS. Do you understand why people don't take you seriously when you say shit like that.

- - - Updated - - -

Not really, there is evidence that backs it up.

Nah Ausr is right. I think it's time to introduce you to my ignore list. Ta Ta.

[Deja Thoris]

You're 100% right, yes they did and our govt are known liars. Guess what? i don't care for any republication or democrat to back trump. .

Trumps a liar too. Proven many times. Care to dispute that?

[Fadeslol]

Trumps a liar too. Proven many times. Care to dispute that?

When he has lied? Start giving me cases

[Spectral]

Care to explain why?

I guess I think I have. If you don't get why predicting S&P 500 changes to a tenth of a percent a decade out without an error bar is absurd, I don't know what to tell you.

[Fadeslol]

Go ahead and provide evidence of that claim. A non-russian propaganda, non conspiracy theory cite will suffice. It's not to say that some rebel groups do not shift alliances but to claim that they all are is just nonsense. Yet again.

And then you claim you do not know who they are, but the groups you don't know, are defecting towards ISIS. Do you understand why people don't take you seriously when you say shit like that.

- - - Updated - - -



Nah Ausr is right. I think it's time to introduce you to my ignore list. Ta Ta.

Run from the Truth, that's all.

[Bollocks]

Since you're probably a Bernie supporter

https://www.sanders.senate.gov/downl...ed?inline=file

1. Read A company is not a buisness for any claim that free trade agreements cost jobs, also those jobs would have been either outsourced or automized anyway. \
2. ISDS cannot challenge laws, they can only ask for money. And thus so far there hasn't been abuses to the system. If you feel worried about ISDS then you should welcome the TPP as it will bring many solutions to the current system problems
3. This is just flat out false.
4. Ok there is an argument to be made for enviroment; mainly that as of now the TPP lacks a formal way of reinforcing the restrictions it puts, but the argument Bernie is putting is wrong. See 1
5. This is false, just because the US has free trade it does not mean it will not respect food safety standards.
6. This is just false, same argument was made during NAFTA
7. I already covered this.
8. This needs a source to back up.
9. The TPP demands countries like Vietnam to raise their standards.
10. All FTAs have exit clause.

[Ghostpanther]

I thought trump was pivoting after last night and wouldn't have another big slip up for some time.

Then he tells blacks they have nothing to lose.

Granted, he has potentially negative 3% support with them, so he has nothing to lose by saying this from the african american community, but obviously it's not doing him any favors.

Of course the media is going to report his pivot and his regrets and act like hes turning it around, but in reality, same trump.

I disagree. I think it was a smart thing for him to do by asking for their vote. All they have to do is ask themselves are they better off than they were 7 years ago. Hillary will only continue the failed policies which have have not helped them at all when it comes to the economy and violence among them.

He is doing exactly what he needs to do to get back on track and make it a closer race then the polls are currently showing. How effective it will be is yet to be seen.

[Bollocks]

I guess I think I have. If you don't get why predicting S&P 500 changes to a tenth of a percent a decade out without an error bar is absurd, I don't know what to tell you.

Except they do have a standard deviation.

[Fadeslol]

Run from the Truth, that's all.

http://www.ronpaul.com/2015-08-08/us...port-for-isis/

[Ghostpanther]

So Trump is apologizing for his wording? Now will his fans be mad at him for going PC, and going against "says what he really means" or will they now praise him for regretting not being PC?

It will not make any difference among his base of dedicated voters. It could however make a big difference for those on the fence and esp. among the Republican party members.

[Deja Thoris]

When he has lied? Start giving me cases

He says Hilary wants to Abolish the 2nd amendment for starters.