Which is kinda why it needs to be legalized
I don't approve of the use of marijuana, but I don't really see the point in spending billions fighting it. It's completely pointless and a massive waste of resources, when it could be grown and sold legally to the benefit of the state AND the individual.
I'm aware.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.2533960
Getting off with a slap on the wrist because you're rich and white shouldn't happen.
I really don't think he is. While people often take over the top examples of twitter based political correctness and desire for the censorship of competing opinions as their smoking gun when talking about the creep in of authoritarianism in the west, the truly disturbing elements are often elsewhere in the political spectrum. President Obama somewhat recently compared gun control legislation to automotive safety regulation and during the answer very casually describes the state of heavy surveillance and preemptive action the government uses to police and restrict terrorist sympathizers which is a deeply deeply authoritarian state of affairs and much more akin to Orwell's 1984 than people who act outraged on the internet in the spare time.
This answer was lauded by his supporters and democratic party supporters in general as the common sense answer to the gun control debate, and there was no great outrage from opposition over the fact that they are in a very real sense now restricting their own citizens based on the "thoughtcrime" of sympathizing with terrorists and publicly maligning that they cannot pass legislation to allow them to further restrict the rights of citizens who have committed no crimes. I find that so terribly out of character for a country that is supposed to have a deep deep libertarian streak in its DNA, and a sign that not only has authoritarianism started to creep into the culture, but its become rapidly normalized.
Honestly I think it's fine for laws to restrict behavior that will negatively impact the quality of life of other citizens. Why do you want to legally be able to call someone racist slurs if not to be able to go around calling people racist slurs? What benefit is there to hate speech being legal? And why is your right to call someone a "nigger" more important than that person's right to be able to live comfortably in their country? Racism/hate speech isn't, and shouldn't be, a civil right.
I guess the kettle doesn't want to admit it's color and just keep pointing at the pot.
From Norway. One country. And it was a much bigger case than simply saying the word nigger. Stop trying to oversimply for shit just to fit your broken argument.
Its human nature that those who were once oppressed, after being free from their oppression will turn around and engage in the same oppressive behavior just from the new moral perspective. No human society is free from this as humans always have an out group that they pen their troubles upon. Its most likely your ideology is currently in waning from its current position of power and a new one, formally held back by yours, will take its place.
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."
Thurin, are you gonna keep linking that? Ofc Germany has strict laws on Nazism. It's almost as if they had a lot of trouble with Nazism, idk, about 70-80 years ago.