As new details of the encounter continue to emerge, legal experts in Rio say the security guards’ actions merit an investigation, claiming they might have broken Brazilian law by threatening the swimmers with guns as they demanded payment.
The crime experts point to arbitrary exercise of personal force, or vigilante justice.
Rio state judge João Batista Damasceno compared the incident to a landlord collecting rent from a tenant — with a gun in his hand. Even if the money is owed, force cannot be used, he said.
“This security guard or any other person can run after the person” who is fleeing the scene, Damasceno said. “They get you, hold on to you and call the police, which will eventually accompany that person to the station.”
“The security guards weren’t defending themselves. They were holding the athletes by pointing a firearm,” Costa said. “It is common (in Brazil) and ends up being natural to have private armed security. Which is very dangerous — this case came close to being a tragedy. They were drunk youth being held by two armed security guards.”
Veloso said at the news conference that nothing in the investigation had indicated an inappro*priate use of force. He described it as necessary to “contain” the swimmers who were particularly strong men.
“Was there a weapon pointed at them? Yes,” Veloso said.
None of the swimmers could speak Portuguese. They tore an advertising sign, peed on some bushes, they get a gun pointed at them and were shaken down for $200.