If Hitler was alive he would definitely be triggered by all those claims.
If Hitler was alive he would definitely be triggered by all those claims.
well, generally speaking, Liberal Arts used to be defined as essential skills a free person should know in order to take part in civilized world. These days in north america in the other hand it usually refers to matters not related stem fields.
how ever, the comment you quoted here in OP, sounds like a desperate attempt by people who get overwhelmed if they try to think rationally. ( to be honest I haven't read the context which this quote was relevant in, but that should not change the stupid nature of said statement.)
Last edited by HumbleDuck; 2016-08-25 at 08:27 AM.
This might be the best thread in the off topic forum right now! :> Still not quite sure what its about.
"And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five?
A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head."
Hitler was a extremist who blamed everyone and everything for his own failures refusing to accept the fact that life is harsh and not everyone is meant to succed. Instead he created a narrative upon which there are oppressed/have nots/regular people and the oppressors/haves/privileged people.
It does sound very familiar dont you guys think?
It's all true. He was a painter in Vienna, he was denied access and didn't have the grades for architecture. He continued to paint throughout his life, mostly of his dogs. He wrote Mein Kampf, in which he stated his hate for the Jews started in Vienna. There were extreme racial tensions in Vienna. As far as I know none of that is half truths. I even stated that I was unsure of the philosophy aspect of it.
Many historians do attribute his trip to Vienna, and his homeless days that followed his failure, to the beginning of that hate, though to an extent is a theory based off what he wrote.
... Vienna isn´t in italy. How about the part of him being made fun of probably including jews where his hate came from? He studied anti-semitism in vienna. And about him painting only shepherds later on? I can find probably one painting of a german shepherd attributed to hitler. Hitler himself said he was bad at writing and i never heard anything about him pursuing philosophy apart from trying to mold german philosophy into his nazi agenda.
It´s like between this and the first post i quoted you read up on him.
Said it before: ideas of separating people into classes of "oppressor"and "victim", "privileged" vs "non-privileged" - especially when bolstered with a paranoid historical narrative (like "patriarchy" and "rape culture") - these are all philosophies used to justify hatred
Bolshevik communism was about hatred of the wealthy oppressors, particularly the landed gentry and owners of companies; Nazism was about hatred of those responsible for vicitimising the German people after Versailles, especially Jews and the banks but also the rest of Europe; feminism and SJW philosophies are about hatred of men, especially white men, for victimising women and all other ethnic groups with patriarchy and colonialism
Note that all 3 of these philosophies had/have the support of the local majority at the time
What you wrote doesnt negate my hypothesis.
He used the victim narrative to get the power in form of "Us betrayed true hard working people" vs "Them scummy jews who manipulate events against us".
He pretended to be strong and accused his enemies of being weak.
A good orator can sell a lie.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
That´s a rather black and white view. While the mentioned philosophies can be used to justify hatred, they can also be used to simply start discussions about change.
The one thing people have to keep in mind that´s actually pretty easy to remember is "not all of <insert group>".
and French revolution was about hatred towards feudal regime?
bourgeois "hatred" towards feudals is the same as communist "hatred" towards capitalists, i.e. its a "hatred" of exploited people towards exploiters. So this "hatred" is well founded, it comes from material basis - the way of economical life. Yes, these ideas, that have strong materialistic basis, can be spinned-off in order to ignite revolution, but they (ideas) are not a primal reason for "hatred" - economy is.
Nazism, as well as any other fascist ideology, is idea without any firm ground. The ground is invented artificially to spin-off hatred. Victimization of German people surely helped german people to get hooked on this ideology easier. But its not a ground for Nazism. Facism, nazism, racism, and nationalism were very popular in Europe of that time, not only in Germany. Why? Cause these "ideas" were a joker in a hands of capitalists, who used it to derail workers "hatred" from them and to make people to work for them almost for free, because "they are family". That is a reason of every fascist ideology - ideology with a fake grounds.
Last edited by Keeponrage; 2016-08-25 at 09:25 AM.