Republican Election 2016 - Donald Trump Megathread [OFFICIAL]

[Shalcker]

It is kinda amusing that we have a white supremacist stating that xxxxxx pride groups are inherently wrong. I mean has he looked in the mirror recently?

Are you saying someone who would belong to white supremacist group would not be biased?

[DeadmanWalking]

Aww, but it calms down quite a bit after the election, like always.

Nah, the coaches just call different plays. If the coin toss doesn't end with you getting the ball you spend the rest of the game trying to stop your opponent from making any headway while decrying every play they make as anti-american and the core of all evil, if you get the coin toss you try to get as much yardage as you can while decrying every move your opponent makes to slow you down as anti-american and the core of all evil.

"You are perfect, your opponent is evil." just a question of which side of the ball you end up on.

[zenkai]

I didn't say anything about 2 wrongs making a right now did I, you don't like what I said so you are trying to dismiss it. I said they were bad ideals which were never acted on, nothing illegal about that. It looks bad, is bad but that doesn't mean that Hillary was the one making the emails and firing them off. Had she been involved the buck wouldn't of stopped at Schultz.

I'm sorry that I say facts and don't just agree with made up shit.

Then why are you bringing up what the RNC has or hasn't done? You did compare you pretty much insinuated, well the RNC is probably doing it too. So yes you did say it.

[DeadmanWalking]

Are you saying someone who would belong to white supremacist group would not be biased?

Thats exactly the opposite of what he said.

[Kujako]

Aww, but it calms down quite a bit after the election, like always.

No. After the election one side declare the results illegitimate and then shouts that they'll do everything they can to make sure the winner can't accomplish anything, no mater what it is. Trump's already started on the first step.

[DeadmanWalking]

Then why are you bringing up what the RNC has or hasn't done? You did compare you pretty much insinuated, well the RNC is probably doing it too. So yes you did say it.

Now you are literally making shit up, putting words in my mouth and then trying to use it as proof against me. Are you sure you are not a member of the Trump election committee?

[zenkai]

When it comes to politics the shit show never ends.

Most of them that do that don't even post any thing worth reading, and apparently in their eyes if you prove a lie about Trump wrong, then you're a Trump supporter. LOL.

[DeadmanWalking]

ITs actually sad, all the anti trump people do is call racism every 3 seconds. You can't even have discussions, it's like a soccer match with people diving every post. Oh well thank god for the ignore option

<- Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, gets butthurt that people call him a duck.

Go watch a white supremecist doctrine youtube video and see how much you agree with them. I know, I know, even racists don't like being called racists but like Trump I call it how I see it and I tell it like it is.

[zenkai]

Now you are literally making shit up, putting words in my mouth and then trying to use it as proof against me. Are you sure you are not a member of the Trump election committee?

Please explain to me how you writing:

You are attributing it to hillary because it sounds good and fits your political narrative you made up in your head. If every boss who ever hired someone who did something bad was punished for it there wouldn't be any bosses.

If you think the RNC wasn't sending similar emails to Rubio and Cruz to start saying buzzwords about Trump like, "Con-man" or "Entertainer" then you are being willfully blind. They just didn't get caught.
.

Is not trying to excuse what happen in the DNC because it probably happened in the RNC too. There is no other way to take that in context. You're whole argument is based on a probability, one that I can agree to say is could very well be true but none the less it's not a known fact.

[Aggrophobic]

Nah, the coaches just call different plays. If the coin toss doesn't end with you getting the ball you spend the rest of the game trying to stop your opponent from making any headway while decrying every play they make as anti-american and the core of all evil, if you get the coin toss you try to get as much yardage as you can while decrying every move your opponent makes to slow you down as anti-american and the core of all evil.

"You are perfect, your opponent is evil." just a question of which side of the ball you end up on.

I doubt Trump will keep up the political work if he loses. It is the oppositions job though, to work for their ideas and make sure they win the next election, is it not?
US politics have turned into a bit of a circus though, I'll give you that.

No. After the election one side declare the results illegitimate and then shouts that they'll do everything they can to make sure the winner can't accomplish anything, no mater what it is. Trump's already started on the first step.

Well, that politics for you.

[Shalcker]

Thats exactly the opposite of what he said.

But it came from argument of judge belonging to certain group that caters to interests of certain races not affecting his impartiality...

[NYC17]

How is that different than any other politicians? I mean the last guy we elected pretty much had 0 life experience other than a Senator for less than 2 years and he preached hope and dreams. LOL

Zero life experience other than being a Senator? Seriously, do you even do a cursory search before saying things you clearly sont have actual information on?

I can only imagine what constitutes"life experience" in your world

[alexw]

Are you saying someone who would belong to white supremacist group would not be biased?

No I am pointing out the irony of Satimy's extreme bias on race due to being a white supremacist while he himself is pointing at other groups exclaiming "look see they are racially biased!!".

It takes an incredible lack of self-awareness to do that.

[zenkai]

Zero life experience other than being a Senator? Seriously, do you even do a cursory search before saying things you clearly sont have actual information on?

I can only imagine what constitutes"life experience" in your world

Sorry I should mention, graduated Harvard became a Community Leader, wrote 2 books about how great he think he is.

[Shalcker]

No I am pointing out the irony of Satimy's extreme bias on race due to being a white supremacist while he himself is pointing at other groups exclaiming "look see they are racially biased!!".

It is not called "irony", it is called "projection".

It takes an incredible lack of self-awareness to do that.

It is incredibly natural thing for most people. Capability to deep introspection is fairly rare trait - and it is often not necessary. Humans are group-based creatures, there is always someone else to point out things you cannot see yourself.

[DeadmanWalking]

Please explain to me how you writing:



Is not trying to excuse what happen in the DNC because it probably happened in the RNC too. There is no other way to take that in context. You're whole argument is based on a probability, one that I can agree to say is could very well be true but none the less it's not a known fact.

If you bothered to folow that conversation back far enough you would see that I was refering to someone who said that only democrats use the victim card to motivate the base, in which I described ways in which the R party used victimhood to motivate the base into social action as well. Then I said that the belief that their party is pure as the driven snow and the other is the core of all evil is at its best delusional and at it's worst hypocritical. Both parties are guilty of spit balling ideals of how to make one candidate they don't like less desireable, but yet the only one they want to refer to is the other party and then they shoe horn hillaries name onto the emails in thier imaginations to make her specifically behind it all.

I am not delusional enough to think 'my party' is pure and good and the other is 'evil'. I also never stated that two wrongs made a right, I said they were both wrong. Both parties are pretty shitty as is politics in general. I also don't assume that someone is telling the truth just because we are in the same party together nor do I assume that someone is lieing just because they belong to the other party.

But if I expose that the Hillary email about Sanders had nothing to do with Hillary then I must be a hillary supporter when I am actually an Independent and more of an Anti-Trump voter than a pro-hillary voter.

Frankly those emails are full of nothing, just some dnc people making bad spitball ideals that were not actually put into action and were not illegal, at worst it shows they were biased against Bernie but not one showed they put a plan into action to discredit/disable/or remove Bernie. Bad ideals float around offices all the time, in this case the DNC chair told them not to pursue those spitballs. The only reason why it became newsworthy is because certain people wanted the DNC to look bad at just the right time to cause maximum unrest just before the DNC convention. People who are not trying to look out for Bernie or America's best interest but rather people who just want to see political structures across the planet burn.

- - - Updated - - -

It is not called "irony", it is called "projection".

It is incredibly natural thing for most people. Capability to deep introspection is fairly rare trait - and it is often not necessary. Humans are group-based creatures, there is always someone else to point out things you cannot see yourself.

Psychologists have to go see other psychologists to balance their personal mental issues much like a hair cutter has to go to another hair cutter to get their hair done properly. Nobody is really that great at self-introspection, some are better than others but even psychologists know you personally are not going to see everything you should with your own examination.

[zenkai]

If you bothered to folow that conversation back far enough you would see that I was refering to someone who said that only democrats use the victim card to motivate the base, in which I described ways in which the R party used victimhood to motivate the base into social action as well. Then I said that the belief that their party is pure as the driven snow and the other is the core of all evil is at its best delusional and at it's worst hypocritical. Both parties are guilty of spit balling ideals of how to make one candidate they don't like less desireable, but yet the only one they want to refer to is the other party and then they shoe horn hillaries name onto the emails in thier imaginations to make her specifically behind it all.

I am not delusional enough to think 'my party' is pure and good and the other is 'evil'. I also never stated that two wrongs made a right, I said they were both wrong. Both parties are pretty shitty as is politics in general. I also don't assume that someone is telling the truth just because we are in the same party together nor do I assume that someone is lieing just because they belong to the other party.

But if I expose that the Hillary email about Sanders had nothing to do with Hillary then I must be a hillary supporter when I am actually an Independent and more of an Anti-Trump voter than a pro-hillary voter.

Frankly those emails are full of nothing, just some dnc people making bad spitball ideals that were not actually put into action and were not illegal, at worst it shows they were biased against Bernie but not one showed they put a plan into action to discredit/disable/or remove Bernie. Bad ideals float around offices all the time, in this case the DNC chair told them not to pursue those spitballs. The only reason why it became newsworthy is because certain people wanted the DNC to look bad at just the right time to cause maximum unrest just before the DNC convention. People who are not trying to look out for Bernie or America's best interest but rather people who just want to see political structures across the planet burn.

Nothing is wrong with exposing Republican corruption, but why not use factual claims? Surely you could find some.

[Xeones]

Most of them that do that don't even post any thing worth reading, and apparently in their eyes if you prove a lie about Trump wrong, then you're a Trump supporter. LOL.

A lie about Trump proven wrong? Are you talking about when people say Trump isn't racist because "mexico isn't a race"? Hate to break it to you but that isn't "proving" anything.

[DeadmanWalking]

A lie about Trump proven wrong? Are you talking about when people say Trump isn't racist because "mexico isn't a race"? Hate to break it to you but that isn't "proving" anything.

I think you would find that you two are on the same side of the argument but you read what they posted wrong.

[NYC17]

Sorry I should mention, graduated Harvard became a Community Leader, wrote 2 books about how great he think he is.

No, you should mention how his experience is much more extensive than that, and you get your info from conservative Facebook posts and talking point nonsense.

This is the type of stuff that makes it seem like you have no interest in knowing what you're talking about.