The general conservative response to this is, "Well if they couldn't practice self control, they deserve to have their lives ruined. Those who take a little personal responsibility will be fine." The more liberal point of view is "Hey look, we can generally improve outcomes for society as a whole if we understand the reality that people will have sex no matter what and try to educate people based on that assumption."
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
Waiting til marriage isn't psychotically celibate, it's been the expected norm in civilized societies.
There is no evidence of abstinence not working, there is only an issue with the society and parents having lower expectations. No shame in sleeping around = going to happen more and more. Whoring (not in the prostitution sense) has always been around, but there were serious societal and sometimes legal ramifications, not to mention the most sexually prolific being guaranteed to have STDs, as is the case today.
"Unwanted" pregnancies weren't utterly rampant until cultural movements made it acceptable. There was no problem whatsoever with people being so shamed that they had to start over. NO PROBLEM. This shit is responsible for the single motherhood epidemic, and I do hope I don't have to explain why single motherhood is problematic.It doesn't matter how many times you call scientists deranged or whatnot, it simply doesn't work. It never has. On the contrary, teen pregnancy rates and unwanted pregnancy rates were exponentially higher before sex ed.
People just hid it, didn't talk about it, had shady black market abortions, went to live with their aunts in a different state/city, got married at 15/16.
You can't pretend a problem away. You either address it, or it just stays there, festering under the pretenses.
Statistically, womens who follows this kind of esctrict realigeous ways, are way more likely to have a successful marriage because religion wouldn't let them divorce or cheat, not because they dont want.
father's of my ex-gf are still married even that they dont love each other any more. successful marriage? i pass.
- - - Updated - - -
hahahaha rofling
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
First of all, too many things like this are associated with religion and that is stupid. second; sex is not what is important in a relationship although the ability and desire to do it is necessary. the important things are the ability to have a relationship that shows your kids that it is a good thing to get married and have a family, and the ability to be a good parent so they are prepared to succeed in the modern world. the problem with sex before marriage is the subconscious mind experiences a lot of sex with the same person and no kids being produced and since our subconscious mind is still thinking in a pre birth control world it assumes the other person is infertile. with this thinking on a subconscious level we start getting irritated by the other person and the relationship sours. by the way religion is not what helps relationships but prayer for the other person (if done right) can help by helping us care more for the other person.
Last edited by khazmodan; 2016-08-26 at 06:35 PM.
Actually, waiting until marriage is outside of the expected norm in a modern, civilized society. Maybe your sample size is limited to the imaginary standards you've created for your own world view.
What the fuck does being "British" have to do with the EU? Are you trolling or just daft?
The very notion of waiting until marriage is derived directly from religious texts.
Without intimacy, you're just friends.
Britain is still Britain regardless of its EU status. The EU is not a country. It's a union of countries. The term "British" refers to people from Britain, not people from the "EU". And I wasn't insulting you. It was a legitimate question. Especially considering that thread you posted.
What is your point other than to give credence to degenerate fuckwit behavior? It wasn't acceptable in the past so the problems that stem from it did not exist at modern levels.
People still give lip service to the concept but most do not reserve themselves until marriage, with dire consequences that have been gone over several times. You "people" (or bots that spit out mindless regurgitated leftist bullshit, I can't tell the difference now) act like prolific sexual behavior has no negative consequences - you and the other sillies have yet to acknowledge them.
All you've been rambling about for the last however many pages is the same garbage spewed by half-wit religious zealots with no basis in reality or fact. Morality is subjective, which means no one else in the entire fucking world has any obligation whatsoever to take anything that you say as anything other baseless dogma. Yes, having unprotected sex increases your risks. Safe sex, even if it is prolific, is fine.
Clearly the earth is flat, too. Outdated and archaic principles that don't mesh with modern society are in fact, inherently bad for society.
Apparently he thinks that Britain being part of the EU means that all "Europeans" are "British", too.
Last edited by Mistame; 2016-08-26 at 07:18 PM.
Not that you people would know anything about being Christian.
BTW God had the Israelites destroy the Canaanites who were into child sacrifice, which is pretty much what abortion is.
- - - Updated - - -
What your mom does for a living. tee-hee
Last edited by Incredibale; 2016-08-26 at 08:05 PM.