Apologies. Vancouver has been embarrassing Canada for a while.
Apologies. Vancouver has been embarrassing Canada for a while.
This event was created by men, for men.
<bungee considers. 1) living in a land with 1.4+ billion people. 2) A cups are common here. Brain hiccups. 2) A cups are common here. Brain hiccups. WHACK Brain rebooting>Originally Posted by Elim Garak
That was painful. http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=5285
So how long have you lived there?Originally Posted by Tennisace
With COVID-19 making its impact on our lives, I have decided that I shall hang in there for my remaining days, skip some meals, try to get children to experiment with making henna patterns on their skin, and plant some trees. You know -- live, fast, dye young, and leave a pretty copse. I feel like I may not have that quite right.
I always found them a bit odd, but then I lived in Quebec and it was the 60s.Originally Posted by Tennisace
With COVID-19 making its impact on our lives, I have decided that I shall hang in there for my remaining days, skip some meals, try to get children to experiment with making henna patterns on their skin, and plant some trees. You know -- live, fast, dye young, and leave a pretty copse. I feel like I may not have that quite right.
Uhh... yeah? Are you dense?
"See get it because women are usually required to cover their nipples, it'd be funny if men, who aren't required to cover their nipples, do when women don't!"
That's "irony." Not "the matriarchy oppressing you," seeing as they're not requiring anyone to do anything.
Except you can't leave something at "because it's different."
You have to quantify some sort of good or bad behind it.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Grabbing someone's chest, if you take out the sexual part, wouldn't even be assault. You're not hurting anyone.
If a female breast is just the same as a male breast, then ask yourself if you would call it assault if a woman touched a man's chest. If not, then the reverse can't be assault either. Either we're equal or we're not, can't have it both ways. And I maintain the opinion that the female breast is different than the male one, and that's why we treat it differently.
- - - Updated - - -
That's bullshit. Touching someone's shoulder is not sexual assault, unless I touch it with my dick.
- - - Updated - - -
All I hear you say is bla. You are not making any argument.
I repeat, if a breast is not sexual, then touching it would be just like touching a man's chest, therefore it would never be sexual assault.
If I slap a buddy on the chest in good nature, that's not sexual assault, but if I do the same thing to a female, I wouldn't get away with it. That makes no sense if you say there's nothing sexual about the chest.
Make an actual argument against this or shut up.
I love the free the nipple campaighns. I don't give two shots about the rights portion and while I don't want to see every book in the world there are a lot I do want to see. This makes that happen
Dragonflight Summary, "Because friendship is magic"
Yes, both can be assault depending on circumstances; both can be sexual assault, too. That was what I said.
In fact, you do not even have to physically touch someone to commit assault.
And of course, a woman touching a man's chest can be sexual, too, thus it can be sexual assault.
(Why are you insisting on a double standard and claiming it can't?)
And since you apparently didn't see it let me repeat the most important part of that quote:
The assault part is what makes it illegal in both cases.
Explanation: Sexual assault is illegal because it is a form of assault, not because it is sexual.
(In some cases the sexual part can be illegal on its own, but that does not mean that the assault part isn't. The assault part is always illegal. By definition.)
Last edited by Noradin; 2016-08-29 at 09:05 AM.
Fine, if you want to go down that route, shall we then. How stupid are you? First you claim it's biological fact, and when confronted with counter argument of it being CULTURAL, you start bringing specific CULTURAL LAWS to make your point? What is this insane rambling? No one ever argued about it not being such in WESTERN CULTURE, but you claimed it's BIOLOGICAL, meaning the same for EVERYONE. Come up with an argument supporting the biological claim. Cultural laws are not supporting it.
Now go back to school.