How is preventing Sylvanas from gaining the Power to whipe out Humanity the wrong thing?
Yeah, it's shit for the Forsaken. But we all know, with Eyir and the capability to creat as many Val'kyr as she wants, Humanity would have to bleed even more for Sylvanas immortality. He did the right thing for the Alliance, for Humanity. Why should Humanity even try to focus on the Legion, if that would mean to allow another enemy to gain the power to exterminate them all, turning all of them into Undeads?
Genn will die.
Sylvanas is protected.
The end
Anemo: traveler, Sucrose
Pyro: Yanfei, Amber, diluc, xiangling, thoma, Xinyan, Bennett
Geo: Noelle, Ningguang, Yun Jin, Gorou
Hydro: Barbara, Zingqiu, Ayato
Cyro: Shenhe, Kaeya, Chongyun, Diona, Ayaka, Rosaria
Electro: Fischl, Lisa, Miko, Kujou, Raiden, Razor
I don't know if this was meant more joking or serious.. but I like the idea from a story point of view. Jess Greymane would be a fantastic leader (and she's a Rogue.. so like be still my beating heart) but this would create a huge tension between the alliance and the horde.. Jaina .. even if she isn't a dreadlord will call for war and Anduin would have to respond in turn.. Then you have Genn trying to break free and get his final revenge.. Could be interesting.
In the cinematic with sylvanas she enchant the arrow before shoting him, and the wound is black, made me think of a black arrow or somthing, i dont really follow lore to much but alwayse interested to learn more, do we know if he got cured from the curse? could it evolved into somthing else ??
Can we stop trying to get main characters that are trying to promote faction conflict killed please?
For me, people like Sylvanas, Genn, Jaina, Garrosh, and Varian are much more interesting than the likes of Anduinb, Green Jesus, and Old Jesus.
I'm not sure that attacking and killing your allies and making a pitstop to attempt to secure the future of your people are really on the same level. One directly helps the Legion by not only reducing the strength of the armies meeting them via the direct killings and destruction of equipment, but by now dividing their attention between the task they actually set out to do--battling the Legion--and defending themselves from you and seeking revenge. The other at best temporarily removes one individual's leadership.
And, incidentally, if you believe "temporarily removes one individual's leadership" is a horribly wrong thing to do during the fight against the Legion, it applies equally well to Genn running off for revenge against Sylvanas which is another strike in his column.
That's a bit of a non-sequitor.
Even if you believe the whole resurrection thing is irredeemably wrong (personally I see it as a much more interesting gray decision rather than black and white) claiming that "humanity will bleed" with this power is a bit much. It's made pretty clear that resurrected undead are free to do with their new un-lives what they wish, whether that be ending it and returning to the grave, joining the Forsaken or running off on their own. They don't become mindless slaves of Sylvanas like the undead raised by the Lich King did; they are still very much themselves mentally.
If you're fundamentally opposed to the whole thing and think it should be opposed, that's fine, but let's not make it some existential threat to humanity when there is little to support that notion.
“Nostalgia was like a disease, one that crept in and stole the colour from the world and the time you lived in. Made for bitter people. Dangerous people, when they wanted back what never was.” -- Steven Erikson, The Crippled God
I thought it was Rogers who shot first if anything, not Greymane.
Yet again, pretty sure that was Rogers, I could be wrong here though, they're very vague about it on Alliance side. Could of even been a dreadlord
But I'm like 99% sure it was Rogers since she references it was the perfect chance she couldn't let by. So uh...yeah. Only thing Greymane did at that point was either in self defense (The Forsaken around his camp) or to prevent Sylvanas from becoming a huge threat to everyone.
"El Psy Kongroo!" Hearthstone Moderator
Are they even trying to be "noble", though? They were like a proverbial cat in a bag for the Alliance. Or well, a wolf in a bag. They are Gilneans, so even though they betrayed the old Alliance, humans could have felt obliged to accept them in SW simply for the sake of solidarity, as they did. They also had nelves vouching for them. I don't really know why do you think this is bad thematical design, I'd say worgen represent a darker side of the Alliance, which it lacked, aside of an occassional human outcast. Accepting them also shows that Alliance isn't all lawful and noble, it can also be pragmatic - the worgen are shady, but the benefits of having them on their side outweigh the potential risks. They aren't really similar to Horde races, either.
See this is all about misleading perception. The Alliance are supposed to misunderstand what happened, not know how bad the Horde had it over the ridge. That's why we're fighting each other in Legion.
However, we players who can play both Alliance and Horde, or just take the time to read up on both sides, know it's a huge misunderstanding. But so many of you Alliance players can't even comprehend the fact that there's 2 factions.
The Horde is not the bad guys, the Alliance is not the bad guys. Neither faction has an evil leader atm, thus... you dun goof'd