I don't see how that is related to the previous statements, it seems more like an attempt to say that there are corruption in all countries - so Russian is no different; which is a usual Russian propaganda tactic; don't fall for that.
The difference is that Siemens has been fined for their bribes - because bribes are illegal, even if done in foreign countries. Some people actually think that losing a couple hundred million dollars in fines makes it a good idea not to bribe (even if not all are caught etc).
No, it means "holding your nose for great deals", if not actively embracing opportunities to bribe foreign procurer to pick their company. Profits are everything, and it's not corporate job to root out corruption in other countries, their job is getting profits.
Getting hit with hundreds of millions fines while getting multi-billion deals is great. Did they get fined for more then they had in profits?The difference is that Siemens has been fined for their bribes - because bribes are illegal, even if done in foreign countries. Some people actually think that losing a couple hundred million dollars in fines makes it a good idea not to bribe (even if not all are caught etc).
And if it gets "found out" a few years later, one taking the hit might be different from the one sanctioning bribe, thus not providing incentive to stop.
No, their job is to maximize profits while followings the laws - e.g. the ones that make bribery in other countries illegal.
Companies have ethics training of employees to avoid getting into trouble.
Not yet, but after billion in fines several times they might get the message - or the fines and criminal investigations of officers will increase.
Theoretically that should be true. In practice it often isn't.
Remember that Volkswagen emissions scandal as another example? Do you think German regulators were "properly incentivised" to look away (while having plausible deniability)? Or perhaps they just were incompetent? Companies can and do exploit that too.
And if it wasn't for whistleblower they would continue to get away with it by claiming it's just technical glitches and nothing else.
Proving bribes in foreign jurisdiction is also complex process with many hurdles along the way. Most cases take years from event to actual fine, and fines are often in slap-of-the-wrist range.
Maybe in US. Corporate culture can be quite different around the world and in different companies. Plus, "ethics" and "profits" have to be weighted against each other, and sometimes profits still win.Companies have ethics training of employees to avoid getting into trouble.
Until that happens they'll keep bribing when they think they can get away with it (at least get away long enough to get bonus and then switch jobs).Not yet, but after billion in fines several times they might get the message - or the fines and criminal investigations of officers will increase.