Let's talk about this article on Huffington post...

[jimboa24]

I see your point, but you (as in the person in question) must be a homongous imbacile to actually make their decision on who gets their vote out of spite over a random guy, writing a comment-article in a newspaper.

...who am i kidding. This is the age of tumblr...

At this point, with the election being roughly a month away, there are two types of voters: decided or undecided. If you're undecided, you may not vote purely out of spite, but one side being particularly insulting or assholish to you just might be enough to be the tipping point that decides your vote. It sure as shit would for me.

[Hammerfest]

Ha, bullshit, I've heard plenty of ad hominem from conservatives, and not just on this forum. Don't act like they're innocent.

I like how you waited until I was temporarily banned to respond. That took guts. You truly are a lion of the forums.

[Adam Jensen]

I like how you waited until I was temporarily banned to respond. That took guts. You truly are a lion of the forums.

I would have said the same damn thing if you weren't banned.

The cons on this forum have the biggest victim complex I've ever seen.

[Hammerfest]

I would have said the same damn thing if you weren't banned.

Sure, buddy.

[RickJamesLich]

The Huffington post is a disgrace to journalism, but the best thing you can do is just not waste your time checking out their articles. Do your part and don't waste your time with that shit.

[Powerogue]

People get paid to swear and toss around insults like it's the youtube comments section?

I've found my one true calling. Dropping out of college as we speak.