"and no good company wants someone whose primary concern is money" -- that's flat out silly. Of course it's politically incorrect to say that in an interview that yes, you're biggest concern is money. Loot is the reward for progress. Having managers/leaders hand out loot/bonuses to friends instead of people who earned it and you (and others) being ok with that speaks volumes.
This is the problem. People want fairness and the only way to force that is to use personal loot now. Only newbies have not been shafted by a loot council before. The more experienced people have seen it more than once or had it done to them more than once which is why they are reluctant to trust.
It's silly to imply, which is what you're doing, that loot is secondary or much lower down on the reward pile than anything else. The reason it's silly/stupid is because you can't progress without that loot. This means that if (for easy numbers) you have an iLvl 100 trinket. The other person has iLvl 200. the iLvl of the trinket is 213. Who should it go to? The one who needs it the most? The one who rolled the highest? The one whose best in slot it is?
The problem is councils rarely stick to a singular reward system and "bend" the rules for their friends. After a while your raid is mostly geared with 213 loot and you're barely hitting 150 but hey.. you downed those bosses, right? Except now you can't do anymore bosses because you need better loot because you can't keep up with the others.
This is the inherent flaw. This isn't to say all LC's do this -- but I've almost always seen guilds disband over things like this. It starts off fair.. then it slowly, ever so slowly, slides away from fairness. You might not see it yet because you're new. I get that - but it's very common. It won't take you long to see it and I hope you never get burned by it but you probably will one day. You'll probably PUG one day and forget to ask about loot.. something will drop you've been needing and .. it goes to their friend and not you because.. who are you? A nobody. You'll petition a GM... GM will say tough luck. You'll /gquit. People will ask... some will leave. They won't have enough to do 20mythic. Guild falls apart. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Or maybe you are that friend who benefits so you don't care. /shrug
Right. Loot Council will tell you that they don't want you in their guild if you're concerned about loot. That in itself already contradicts the system of Loot Council, as they're wanting total control over the loot drops.
They'll say that we like to implement optimization within the raid. What that means is that the good ole boys are 12 ilvl's above you, and the loot is going to them because they 'pull their weight'.
Hiding behind rhetoric goes both ways. Fair play is always recognizable.
Except that loot council 9/10 times biased and dumb. There are much better systems out there and guilds who don't use them are just trying to take advantage of the system. Its not just me that agrees with this either.. but in my experience every guild that has it.. abuses that power with their tight group of 7-10 people. I've gone entire tiers with only getting 1 or 2 pieces of gear, of course I left those guilds after that.
No mythic raiding guild will use personal loot, it will either be some kind of DKP system or loot council. As with everything it can be abused, but you can be fairly certain it's not the case if the guild have existed for a while since guilds in which the officers abuse the system tend to be rather short lived.
"I don't have to explain my reasoning because I say so but you have to because I say so". Logic. I have read this whole thread, all you have said is LC is fine with ZERO constructive reasoning and yet your shouting "prove it! prove it! prove it!" to everyone that thinks LC is trash or think another system performs better. I have stated my opinion, sorry you don't agree. You could have posted something constructive but you decided be salty to everyone.
I've explained my reasoning.
And your opinion isn't valid without proof. You guys keep using statistics without any type of real proof. 9/10 LC guilds fail? Prove it.
You also can't prove negatives, so again, I don't have to do that. YOU have to prove YOUR claims though.
I mean with a topic thats as subjective and purely based on opinion as is LC bad. Yes our opinions are valid, with almost 12k posts you should be able to understand that.
My proof is my experience of being in more than 10 LC guilds that abused the system. Don't believe me or discredit me? I honestly don't care, its an opinion and other share my opinion. Have a good day.
Loot Council is used, because despite the chance of corruption, any drama caused by LC, would merely be a drop in the ocean compared to the dramashitstorm you usually get from any DKP-based system.
Personal loot is not an option for any Mythic guild, for obvious reasons.
Last edited by ThrashMetalFtw; 2016-09-23 at 10:44 PM.
They're (short for They are) describes a group of people. "They're/They are a nice bunch of guys." Their indicates that something belongs/is related to a group of people. "Their car was all out of fuel." There refers to a location. "Let's set up camp over there." There is also no such thing as "could/should OF". The correct way is: Could/should'VE, or could/should HAVE.
Holyfury armory
All loot to personal loot, everywhere. No exceptions.
Mythic guilds will cry? They constitute such a small % of us all, their concerns are a fart in the wind.
" The guilt of an unnecessary war is terrible." --- President John Adams
" America goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy." --- President John Quincy Adams
" Our Federal Union! It must be preserved!" --- President Andrew Jackson
If you become an integral member of the group, you tend to get loot.
I was a Death's Demise.
Those were the good old days.