The class hall campaign is the "participation award" skin if you feel you're entitled to something just for paying a sub.
Raid skin is from raiding. Raid skin is also only one of five skins at launch. There are even more later like the sixth skin already in the database.
Nor does it make blizzard right. The default answer because blizzard said so is exceptionally poor. Like i said things like this really really have to be done subtly because if you make it to obvious then it stops.being a game and simple becomes an exercise in figuring out what hoops they want me to go through. You see the box for what it is. I think rewarding the skin can ve handled in a much more circumspect fashion.
This is an abysmal argument, and not one in which I would attach my name to if I were you. Entitlement does not equate to the proportional relationship between effort and reward insofar as it does not make one entitled to assume an increase in effort/skill needed will lead to an increase in reward. In fact, entitlement can only reasonably describe your position in this discussion, as you are seemingly positing that it is preferable for personal enjoyment as well as game health, which was a throwaway point anyway as it is wholly irrelevant, for higher rewards to come from minimal effort.
To spare you the condescending explanation, I will simply say that increased reward best incentivises increased effort in that the proportionality remains constant. Disregarding the outliers who need no reward for such activity, without these rewards you would see little effort put forth in regards to that content. To suggest otherwise is to attempt to refute centuries of human psychology study and is naive at best and foolish at worst.
Further proof that Blizzard will never make everyone happy at the same time.
- Complaints about the game not being social enough.
- Complaints that some rewards require being social.
Blizzard can't win.
Hardly. What i submit to you is that it functionally all relative. People participating in lfr would.not otherwise see it as lower effort if not for the rest of the game reminding them of exactly what it is. Nor do they necessaripy even view it as such within that paradigm. Im sure you can find many of them who think they do a bang up job. And im sure youll find many who would think that if not for the fact they then realize its not even normal. Or someone spams a dmg meter. Or they cant get that skin cause its onl available on normal.
Offering the higher rewards DIMISHES the ego value they derive fron whatever they do manage to achieve. This is arguable more harmful fornthr gamr as a whole then any notion of entitlement that is being put forth and in my opinion people in favor ofnthis are ultimately arguing forntheirnown entitlement. If it came down to it would you rather see the game succeed or crash and burn but you get to keep yoirs (i.e better rewards)?
Really, none at all? Try again.
In short, raiding in WoW terms is about a collection of 10 or more grouped players in instanced content. Difficulty, which tends to be misused as a standard, has nothing to do with it. Coordination, which there are varying degrees of, is typically required, but I'd offer that if you don't think coordination is required in LFR, have no one in your group enter the tree in Il'agynoth, for example. Wipes happen all the time in LFR, and it's not because of enrage timers.
Last edited by melodramocracy; 2016-09-28 at 09:23 PM.
Obviously not but the point was that if its only ever ultimately a time gate anyway whats the harm in putting it in lfr at a slower pace. Lfr being gated to hell and back. Actually removing it would be more consistent but that doesnt necessarilly mean better.
- - - Updated - - -
Sometimes i wonder if the developers engage in these kinda debates internally or if they just bro fist each other. Id like to be a fly on the wall.
Its hard to see how its "organized" when random dk will make a video soloing in 3 or 4 months. I guess they are organizing themselves? I mean i organize my time to sit down and click for lfr but that doesnt count?
Im glad to see youve had to reduce yourself to just no with as little illumination as possible. Hey that trminds me. Nownthat tier is back in lfr is your explanation for that becauae yes? We are eligible? Or do you still think its awful?