It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
Last edited by Varvara Spiros Gelashvili; 2016-09-29 at 09:57 PM.
Violence Jack Respects Women!
Not enough chin.
Also, this is fun: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...nap-story.html
It's almost like the claims about how Trump is basically a walking dog whistle for racists is true or something.
Last edited by Edge-; 2016-09-29 at 09:56 PM.
Because Ransath has severe allergic reactions to anything that doesn't fit his personal political opinion because his entire universe revolves around himself and if he is proven wrong about anything his ego might collapse sending his world where he is the center of the universe directly into a black hole.
/facepalm
That article you linked doesn't name one single "advisor" - NOT ONE.
It says:
"Some of Donald Trump's advisers are discussing an overhaul in how he prepares for his second face-off with Hillary Clinton, and one option being floated internally is asking Chris Christie to take a leading role to get the Republican nominee ready."
Who is the 'some of Donald Trump's advisers'? WHO?
Hell the only direct quotes from ANY named person involved with Trump is:
"Christie told CNN no request has been made. "I have not been asked to do anything new, and as far as I know, there is no new debate prep scheduled," he said."
He reiterated that point when asked later Thursday by CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "Nothing's been asked of me to do more. If there is, I'd certainly have that conversation with Donald Trump at the time, but I'm not going to presuppose anything at this point."
Like I said - typical BULLSHIT made up by the liberal media.
MONUMENTALLY fucking stupid!
So does that mean we can write off 99% of the stuff Trump says since he's rarely able to name actual names and just uses, "Some people"/"Smart people" etc.?
Or is this the double standard thing where Trump is allowed to do something but the second anyone else does it it's outrageous.
Also, news outlets routinely cite unnamed internal sources in reports. Keeping their identity secret is how they keep those sources talking to them, naming them would mean they'd lose access to almost all their internal sources in campaigns etc.
Yes - it is just you. I am not in "meltdown mode" in any way, shape, or form.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh FFS - not you again and your conflation of things that have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
Regardless, you have already written off 99% of what Trump said? So who gives a fuck? Go for the last 1%!
Out of curiosity...if some of these same advisors, again speaking anonymously (say, to prevent being fired) were to go to FOX, would you accept that?
Be careful. This is a leading question.
In case you didn't see it, here is FOX again accepting the story based on anonymous staffers, and believing it. Still FOX.
Last edited by Breccia; 2016-09-29 at 10:14 PM.
I don't think anyone ignored it - but just like Hillary supporters don't give a flying fuck that she jeopardized national security, I don't give a flying fuck that Trump MIGHT have tried to do business with Cuba. It was a bullshit embargo to begin with and should have been stopped at least 30 years ago.
- - - Updated - - -
WTF does that have to do with anything? I don't believe for one second that there are ANY sources - I believe that CNN are total fucking liars and fabricate 1/2 the shit they "report", with regards to Trump.
Yes, but even journalists at FOX do. Like...all of them.
- - - Updated - - -
You did see the article I linked was written by Howard Kurtz, who has been with FOX since 2013, and he said an anonymous source backing the story contacted him personally, right?
- - - Updated - - -
Why do you think I'm linking FOX sources? Which agree with the CNN report, by the way?
- - - Updated - - -
If it's Newsweek, it's not getting ignored. We're rubbernecking at Ransath right now.
By the way, Trump was pro-Cuba in his Tuesday rally. He wants to free the people there, or something. This will come up again.
Only she didn't. The information on her email/server, sent from other people, classified after the fact, was not even damaging... Lest they would have charged her with a crime. The head of the supreme law enforcement of the land, also a Republican, said no crime had been committed... That her actions were simply careless and at most warranted administrative punishment if she were still in the State Department.
And there is no "might" about the Trump story... They have actual records... Trump Hotels & Casinos, Inc. went to Cuba with no permission or license from the government and spent money there. Whether you agree with the embargo or not is of no consequence, his company (with him at the head) broke the law. And as I said, this is but one of many.
The funny thing about folks like you is you have absolutely NO comprehension of what you read (or watch) and then you make asinine statements based on your incredible lack of comprehension and act as if you have actually made some kind of valid point.
BTW - I don't give a fuck about Fox news. For some reason you must think just because I support Trump I must be in the tank for Fox? Such a limited mind/perspective you have.
LOL - you forgot to label me, little Alex. I know that always makes you feel "safer" when you can label folks so let me get you started....
I am a racist, misogynist, Islamophobe, homophobe, xenophobe, afrophobe (that is a new one, just heard that 2 days ago), alt-right, fundamentalist, climate denier, white privileged, facist....
Hmm, that is all I can think of off the top of my head. I am sure you have some more, little Alex.
Last edited by mmocc836e66a65; 2016-09-29 at 10:44 PM.