so you're telling me i should stop playing my arms warrior and go back to my ret 3rd off spec because its gonna give me 400k dps easier? 4Head
so you're telling me i should stop playing my arms warrior and go back to my ret 3rd off spec because its gonna give me 400k dps easier? 4Head
I am currently leveling my warrior in hopes they fix it soon as I like it way more than my rogue.... so can someone tell me if fury is such shit why is it doing so well on the sims? Are higher Ilvl fury wars able to keep up? According to the sims they should be up there with Ret and Assasin Rogues.
At least you aren't a havoc DH.
I was kind of wondering that myself. I have a Warrior alt and main a Monk, it's astounding to me how the Sims put Fury so high. My similarly geared WW crushes my Fury Warr in every way. The latest Sims with high gear show WW even further behind but that's simply not what I've seen happen.
Sucks cause I find Fury alot of fun to play.
This made my day ... lol. I feel like crap when I go up against a pack of mobs, but when it's time to smash a single target I smash them very well. It fits the philosophy well but man ... our AoE is so shit. Do Rogues really don't have a spec that you can nuke down a single target? I thought Combat would be pretty epic about it.
Also, kitties got nerfed I hear?
@ 110 with optimum gear (current), Fury lags way behind FR Arms. I saw some new buffs for Fury, so I can't comment on the new buffs yet.
The top logs that are rigged are a fraction of a percent. 75th percentile is still in the "git gud" range and the skill cap of the 2 classes you are comparing matter much more. I am a fire Mage, so I don't know the skillcap of WW and arms, but comparing at the 75tg percentile you also have to realize much of the logs are going to be players not playing optimally.
Except you have no idea how arms warrior works or you would know top arms parses are luck streak on average to good players, nothing else.
- - - Updated - - -
Honestly he is only top because the better classes are either less geared/play badly or both. Plus BiS leg
https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statist...841&dataset=95
there you go some statistics your way
- - - Updated - - -
Lol please. arms is not easier than any other class. that's an 2008 argument you have there. As arms you have to track buffs and suffer from rng alot aswell. As arms you are one of the highest CPM classes currently, along with spriests, so you don't sit around waiting for stuff very much.
He is obviously a very impressive player with 95%+ ranking in most encounters as shown by your logs (mind you i havent been through the logs in great depth, just taking the numbers at face value). Despite this he is still getting beaten a lot of the time by the Enhance Shaman who is 7ilvls lower and is only ranking 70-85%. Fury is definitely viable, more so in heroic than mythic, but it still stands that they have to do far more work / be far more skilled to achieve what some other classes can do playing averagely. Numbers aside fury has a lot of mechanical issues holding it back.
Is 350k you linked "destroying" on a 3:40 kill? I did a 5:06 Ursoc kill tonight, pulled 383k without legendary bracers that boost this number by ~30k. While wearing 5 ilvls lower than him. And I only got 90% rank. So yeah, I don't think fury is even close to very good.
Sure top parses may be tied to luck, but there is a big difference between 75% and 99%, and a large amount of that will come down to skill, not luck. A nearly skill-capped player is going to perform much higher than 75%, and a 75% percentile player wont perform at 99%, despite any rng.