only 30% of males in USA and west Europe are sexually active

[Deleted]

This is just plain false. You're reading too much stupid shit on the internet if you believe that talking to a girl in the coffee shop who turns out to be uninterested can be construed as sexual harassment.

First: What is a coffee shop? (Rhetorical question)
Second: If she had a bad day and there is a SJW close by it will be.
Third: Legally speaking evey move you do after beeing turned down is sexual harrassment.

Does this mean east Europe is where you should go if u can't get laid?

Yes, did you never get those popups?

[Spectral]

First: What is a coffee shop? (Rhetorical question)
Second: If she had a bad day and there is a SJW close by it will be.
Third: Legally speaking evey move you do after beeing turned down is sexual harrassment.

First: This question is fucking stupid.
Second: Watch out, those SJWs can be anywhere!
Third: Stop antagonizing people that don't want to talk to you.

This level of paranoia is absurd. I guess it's good cover for being incompetent at talking to people though - it's not my fault, it's that those evil SJWs have made it illegal to talk to people!

[Saucexorzski]

First: This question is fucking stupid.
Second: Watch out, those SJWs can be anywhere!
Third: Stop antagonizing people that don't want to talk to you.

This level of paranoia is absurd. I guess it's good cover for being incompetent at talking to people though - it's not my fault, it's that those evil SJWs have made it illegal to talk to people!

I won't speak to how prevalent such an event is, but the fear is real. Perhaps it's irrational fear, but that's part of being human. Look at how vilified those who are just accused, not even charge or convicted of sexual assault. Tie this into how for the past 30 years, young boys have been taught they are rapists in the making and bam no suprised that many young males have trouble approaching women.

[Jinpachi]

At least get your numbers right: 0.008%

26000 / 320,000,000 = .00008, fuck outta here

- - - Updated - - -

Sex toys can provide certain shapes and sensations that are not possible for human genitalia.

Examples can be provided if you need them. Someone else will probably provide them anyway.

- - - Updated - - -



You either failed or never took any class involving statistics.

Accepting that small of a number to represent the country as a whole is fucking retarded.

[hrugner]

You need to learn to comprehend what you're reading as a whole, rather than singling out minute parts of it and presenting it as a fact to back up your idiotic claim.

Walk me through it then. You're saying people married for more than three years stop having sex. Statistics indicate that married people continue to have sex with much more frequency than their single counterparts. We could assume that people with kids who aren't married tend to have less sex than people without kids, but then why mention marriage?

So what am I missing here?

[Doctor Funkenstein]

Walk me through it then. You're saying people married for more than three years stop having sex. Statistics indicate that married people continue to have sex with much more frequency than their single counterparts. We could assume that people with kids who aren't married tend to have less sex than people without kids, but then why mention marriage?

So what am I missing here?

You're missing the fact that the 'survey' has fuck-all to do with what I said. The percentage of those people being married or not is completely and utterly irrelevant.

Nearly 100% of all biological fathers are sexually active (outliers being those who donate sperm and that sort of thing, which isn't even going to be a notable fraction of that percentage). They had to be in order to be a biological father. And what's more, a huge percentage of married men have sex on a regular basis; it doesn't matter if that regular basis is once a day, once a week, once a month, or even once a year; it still defines them as sexually active even if you ignore the way the term is used in the medical field.

"Having sex once a week" is not, nor has it ever been, the definition for "sexually active." That's the point. It's an idiotic poll/survey/whatever you wanna call that trash.

[Wilfire]

This is what happens when the media sets the standards for attractiveness for women extremely low and for men - extremely high.

[BicycleMafioso]

I find that this statistics is irrelevant even in its definition of active.
Weekly? That's way too much effort.
For me personally, every few months (manic periods in my bipolarity) I go on massive sprees with 3-4 partners per week for two months. And then I lose interest. And may not actually touch another human being for twice the number of months. Or I'm in a more stable part of my moodswing and it's more regular. But weekly is still too narrow of definition.

[Deleted]

Hyperbole requires some grain of truth to be meaningful. This just isn't a thing at all.

Yes apart from all the facts that say otherwise but do carry on.

[May90]

I won't speak to how prevalent such an event is, but the fear is real. Perhaps it's irrational fear, but that's part of being human. Look at how vilified those who are just accused, not even charge or convicted of sexual assault. Tie this into how for the past 30 years, young boys have been taught they are rapists in the making and bam no suprised that many young males have trouble approaching women.

I can understand not approaching someone out of fear of rejection, or ridicule, etc. But if you don't approach someone out of fear to be charged with sexual assault, you seriously need to go check up with specialist.

[Spectral]

I won't speak to how prevalent such an event is, but the fear is real. Perhaps it's irrational fear, but that's part of being human. Look at how vilified those who are just accused, not even charge or convicted of sexual assault. Tie this into how for the past 30 years, young boys have been taught they are rapists in the making and bam no suprised that many young males have trouble approaching women.

I understand approach anxiety just fine. Men have experienced this since time immemorial and it's an entirely normal and natural fear. Blaming it on evil SJWs that could be lurking and ready to press charges on a man for speaking to a woman in a coffee shop or bar is fucking stupid.

[MatadorMedia]

Sex is more frequent in poor people because it's free entertainment. Hence why economically-collapsed Greece is #1 on your frequency chart. People in the USA have a lot more they can be doing with their time.

[Spectral]

This is what happens when the media sets the standards for attractiveness for women extremely low and for men - extremely high.

Which part of the evil media did that? I see some pretty dumpy guys strolling with fit cuties.

- - - Updated - - -

I find that this statistics is irrelevant even in its definition of active.
Weekly? That's way too much effort.
For me personally, every few months (manic periods in my bipolarity) I go on massive sprees with 3-4 partners per week for two months. And then I lose interest. And may not actually touch another human being for twice the number of months. Or I'm in a more stable part of my moodswing and it's more regular. But weekly is still too narrow of definition.

I think it's reasonable to describe this as a sexually dysfunctional lifestyle even if it's not actually "inactive".

[Magicpot]

Doesn't phaze me. People sleep with who they want to sleep with. No sweat off my back if some sleep with 7 different people or some with none.

[Zogarth]

"Weekly". Cutting out all the married men there!

[Rooflesstoofless]

Maybe many Americans have the choice between a food stamp or a condom, which is probably one of the reasons. Cant live without them McBurgers.

You don't get a choice?

Those condoms must taste terrible.

[Deleted]

Never had sex still have sex drive and masturbate pretty normally 1-5 times a week.

But i have zero intention to pursue women for sex, seems like a fucking hassle although it might be good

[sethman75]

I wonder how much porn has to do with the declining numbers? Not that its a bad thing. Population needs to be checked big time.

[Mistame]

Pretty shitty study. Also, masturbation = "sexually active". A nut is a nut. /shrug

"we just get them whales/2s"

This is a perfectly valid "excuse". There's no logical or valid reason to be with someone you're not physically attracted to.

This is what happens when the media sets the standards for attractiveness for women extremely low and for men - extremely high.

First, the standards of attractiveness for women are not "extremely low". Secondly, an individual sets their own standards, independently from external sources. The "media" saying "this is the standard" does not necessarily make it so for the individual.

Those condoms must taste terrible.

Haha.

[cobrahn]

Soooo ammm.... Nobody's gonna bring up the fact that Poland (I know, not WESTERN Europe) is mentioned twice in this poll? With different results? Kinda makes you question the validity of said poll