Julian Assange has had his connection to the internet severed

[Felya]

are you?

ok so tell me, why are we fighting a stealth war with russia in syria?

I seriously doubt you are.

Can you define stealth?

[May90]

I cant provide you the education necessary to realize the obvious - and that's really what this amounts to. If you have zero awareness of a topic, a citation isn't going to remedy that problem.

- - - Updated - - -



as ive said a dozen times over in multiple threads, don't trust me. Just go look.

im more than confident you'll find what youre asking for.... and, as ive mentioned in this thread, thats a big part of the problem too.


you're probably not going to like what you find.

Are you Trump? "I have all the knowledge, all the answers, all the policies. I won't tell you about them right now, but trust me, they are good, and you will see it once you've elected me!"

[Deleted]

I don't know, you tell me. You're the one making the claim, I would hope you can provide some evidence to support it rather than simply responding with a question.

... You're literally denying all of this because it's in the Leaked Democratic Emails isn't it?

[Truculentt]

I don't know, you tell me. You're the one making the claim, I would hope you can provide some evidence to support it rather than simply responding with a question.

you're avoiding the question, because you don't know.

which is why im not playing your citation game.

- - - Updated - - -

Are you Trump? "I have all the knowledge, all the answers, all the policies. I won't tell you about them right now, but trust me, they are good, and you will see it once you've elected me!"

im much better looking than trump.

more importantly, i didnt say "i have them and im holding them hostage".

the information is out there. go get it! dont let me stop you.

[Incredibale]

I'll read through that later, but the conspiracy theory-esque red arrows connecting things in the imgur link already have me chuckling.

Smug bullshit this early in the game?

[Truculentt]

Smug bullshit this early in the game?

its a trap. dont even try.

[Incredibale]

you're avoiding the question, because you don't know.

which is why im not playing your citation game.

You wouldn't get anywhere with it even if you did. If it doesn't come from the sources which spoonfeed them bullshit, they won't accept it. I'm already getting smug bullshit non-engagement on the links I posted.

[Venant]

Smug bullshit this early in the game?

You wouldn't get anywhere with it even if you did. If it doesn't come from the sources which spoonfeed them bullshit, they won't accept it. I'm already getting smug bullshit non-engagement on the links I posted.

He's just trying correct the record

[Deleted]

He's just trying correct the record

More like dismiss the record.

[Deleted]

I just want to ask - have you actually gone to wikileaks site and read whats going on?

do you use any alternative media sources? or are you getting your information from notifications on your iphone?


because you clearly have no idea what's been going on, and the information wikileaks has been posting.

Lets make this clear. Do you have proof of wrong doing? If you do, please lets see it.

If you don't, you got nothing to say here.

[Truculentt]

More like dismiss the record.

exactly. there's no intention to converse. only drops of just bait.

[Venant]

How can we even agree on sources when wikileaks reveals things like:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails...2681#efmABjAEV

> No worries
> Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains
> to u
> Please don't share or tell anyone I did this
> Tell me if I fucked up anything

-From Podesta emails, Glenn Thrush the chief political correspondent of Politico implicating himself in collusion with the Clinton campaign. So far I have seen nobody in the corporate media addressing this, even though people representing Politico are everywhere on the major networks.

We have a government that refuses to investigate its own corruption, and we have a media that refuses to investigate its own collusion.

[Truculentt]

Lets make this clear. Do you have proof of wrong doing? If you do, please lets see it.

If you don't, you got nothing to say here.

generally speaking? sure. go to wikipedia. you'll find the full history of wikileaks there.


on a specific issue? pick an issue. your choice.

- - - Updated - - -

How can we even agree on sources when wikileaks reveals things like:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails...2681#efmABjAEV



-From Podesta emails, Glenn Thrush the chief political correspondent of Politico implicating himself in collusion with the Clinton campaign. So far I have seen nobody in the corporate media addressing this, even though people representing Politico are everywhere on the major networks.

We have a government that refuses to investigate its own corruption, and we have a media that refuses to investigate its own collusion.

The problem is that fraud, and the law governing media, aren't simple. They're complicated.

to understand why the above is a crime, you have to first have context. that is, understand a minimum legality.


in most cases, that's far over the head of the average american.

[May90]

the information is out there. go get it! dont let me stop you.

I think I have enough information to call out your nonsensical position.

[Edge-]

you're avoiding the question, because you don't know.

which is why im not playing your citation game.

I asked you a question, you responded with another question rather than answering.

That's not how a discussion works, dude.

Smug bullshit this early in the game?

When they have the hilarious conspiracy theory-esque red arrows? Yeah, I'm going to have a giggle.

Though "this early in the game"? The Trump camp has been promoting conspiracy theories for the better part of the past year and the election is in 3 weeks. We're damn late in the game, dude.

[Deleted]

generally speaking? sure. go to wikipedia. you'll find the full history of wikileaks there.


on a specific issue? pick an issue. your choice.

Any issue. Get me some proof of Hillary beeing "crooked" and behind a conspiracy to silence Assange. Go on. I'm not the one that has to look it up, you are the one making the claim. Bring proof for your claim if you want me to take it seriously.

[May90]

Any issue. Get me some proof of Hillary beeing "crooked" and behind a conspiracy to silence Assange. Go on. I'm not the one that has to look it up, you are the one making the claim. Bring proof for your claim if you want me to take it seriously.

This isn't how it works! Either you agree with him, or you are an ignorant sheeple.

/s

[Poopymonster]

Funny how marxist-socialist do the same thing. Hitler was a socialist and he promised healthcare for all and advocated for and eventually disarmed the people to make them feel safe. He even had a group marching around and intimidating people to think like they do and anyone who didn't needed to be silenced or had their businesses firebombed. This group was called "The Brown shirts" by Hitler and his fellow socialists. Sounds a bit familiar and the GOP center that was firebombed is history repeating itself. That group also made up words and phrases for those that didn't agree with their actions to try and demonize them. Words like one side is making up today like totalitarianism and fascism.

Sorry but Hitler actually loosened gun regulations. After WWI Germans weren't allowed a piece of string, much less a firearm. Adolf gets in power, loosens the laws, people own guns, repeat, until the only people who can't own the guns are the Jews.

Does Wiki count? It has sources that aren't circle jerks in this article.

[Truculentt]

Any issue. Get me some proof of Hillary beeing "crooked" and behind a conspiracy to silence Assange. Go on. I'm not the one that has to look it up, you are the one making the claim. Bring proof for your claim if you want me to take it seriously.

He just did. look at the email.

How can we even agree on sources when wikileaks reveals things like:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails...2681#efmABjAEV



-From Podesta emails, Glenn Thrush the chief political correspondent of Politico implicating himself in collusion with the Clinton campaign. So far I have seen nobody in the corporate media addressing this, even though people representing Politico are everywhere on the major networks.

We have a government that refuses to investigate its own corruption, and we have a media that refuses to investigate its own collusion.

The number of incidences is absolutely staggering.

what more do you need? I'm not saying that aggressively.



lets put trump totally aside for a second. suppose Hillary is already president.


what would it take for you to acknowledge your government has gone astray (by that I mean corrupt)?

Obviously if they were guilty, they aren't going to confess. So what does it take to win your heart?

[May90]

lets put trump totally aside for a second. suppose Hillary is already president.


what would it take for you to acknowledge your government has gone astray (by that I mean corrupt)?

Obviously if they were guilty, they aren't going to confess. So what does it take to win your heart?

Maybe some evidence, for once? Rather than wacky conspiracy theories: "They have done this, and then she has done this - obviously there is connection here!!!"