Maybe, but he did ask you for what you had to show and then you repeated what he said. Repeating him isn't a counter argument. Try answering his question before proposing a new question.
His attitude makes sense to me. If you want to ignore his question why should he give you the time of day to answer yours?
Getting caught preaching false information based on false personal beliefs is no fun, so his defense mechanism triggered - "you show me your data first".
But data is readily available and confirms what everyone involved even a bit in theorycrafting knows - there is no such thing as "insane fire scaling" https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statist...aled&boss=1841
Care to read my previous replies, please?
- - - Updated - - -
https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statist...841&dataset=90
https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statist...841&dataset=95
https://www.warcraftlogs.com/statist...841&dataset=99
Fire it's consistently on the higher end of the spectrum. Which is what i said.
More so on NH.
Be aware of the "higher end".
you could be a bit more accurate when you cherry pick stuff around the web, anyway.
p.s.: Are we considering Fire as a "dedicated" ST spec, anyway?
On par with "SOME" of the other specs. Not everyone of them is up there.
Again, the most important question: is fire supposed to be a dominant ST spec?
Because we know Blizzard won't grant a spec to be strong in every area.
a 44% shadowpriest who is nearly 10 item levels below him.
- - - Updated - - -
We have the same legendaries! Twins! At least the cc ring has good stats on it, the boots are just garbage.
- - - Updated - - -
Seems like a pain in the ass and you'll only ever get 1lb off per spawn so you're likely going to do more damage with UM anyway. Extra work for no gain.
It's honestly obvious Blizzard will swing the axe to S.Priests.
We don't know yet how they'll manage it, tho.S2M design is cockblocking them on how to deal with the spec
Prolly they will try to mess with mass hysteria; considering a 120s VF equals to 120% damage to the dots without taking account of the immense haste buff and ToF sub 35% and the 100% uptime.
All in all, the relative power of Fire compared to the other specs will pretty stay the same as now.
bcoz you need to differentiate between spellcoefficient getting reduced and how much that will be in dmg, 24% is how much the spellcoef was reduced where as 6% is the overall dmg reduction, so if you would deal 100k pr pyroblast, you would then deal 94k after the nerf, as dps we only really care about the effect and in this case the effect would that pyroblast would deal 6% less dmg than now.