Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
LastLast
  1. #41
    Moderator chazus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    17,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Zombergy View Post
    No, the only thing that surprises me here is that they're not charging interests.
    Except, they are.
    have been ordered to repay large enlistment bonuses — and slapped with interest charges, wage garnishments and tax liens if they refuse
    Which just means.... everyone is unsurprised.
    Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
    Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro

    IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads
    "Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by chazus View Post
    Except, they are.

    Which just means.... everyone is unsurprised.
    Oh ya interest if they refuse to pay back on demand, utter bullshit.
    MAGA
    When all you do is WIN WIN WIN

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Mihalik View Post
    Just to clarify a couple of things.

    I find this both amazingly disgusting and mindboggling. But it is also worth noting that THIS is one of the countless moronic, idiotic, ass backwards retarded policies left over from the Bush era.

    There is absolutely no reason to shift the blame or burden either to the State of California, its people or its current government.

    There are 3 lots to blame here. The Bush era retards running the Pentagon and the people who just gave them a blank check with no oversight, and the current morons who are indiscriminately hounding veterans for something that isn't their fault.

    OP you really need to redirect your anger where it belongs. Bush, the blank check warhawks and the pencil pushers at the Pentagon now.

    The Federal government should step in to mend this situation reasonably.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Again it's not the State of California. It's the California National Guard, under the Pentagon. It was the Pentagon's money and it's the Pentagon demanding it back.

    Bush literally had nothing to do with it. The question is will the next POTUS get it fixed on their behalf.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Creamy Flames View Post
    Once more, the US system punishes the people furthest down on the ladder instead of those at the top who made the mistake and can actually pay for it.
    Capitalism as usual.
    \

    Has NOTHING to do with capitalism my socialist friend.

  4. #44
    Deleted
    lol America.

  5. #45
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemposs View Post
    Devil's advocate; couldn't you actually make the argument that government is doing a good thing in not neglecting wrongful out payments and ensuring that they clean up their mistakes and not just throw around the tax payers money recklessly?

    Again, I am just playing devil's advocate here.
    You could if you ignore everything else. Those bonuses where part of a contract (at least something similar). Do the vets get back their time spent in the army?

  6. #46
    Scarab Lord TwoNineMarine's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Man Cave Design School
    Posts
    4,232
    Eat a fat one government.

    Let those guys keep their money. You fucked up. They didn't.
    "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” - General James Mattis

  7. #47
    You can't go after dept that old, this isn't stupid loans, the government can fuck off.

  8. #48
    So if it was the National Guard that committed the overpaying, why aren't the ones to get punished?
    Quote Originally Posted by Kangodo View Post
    Does the CIA pay you for your bullshit or are you just bootlicking in your free time?
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirishka View Post
    I'm quite tired of people who dislike something/disagree with something while attacking/insulting anyone that disagrees. Its as if at some point, people forgot how opinions work.

  9. #49
    Merely a Setback Sunseeker's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    In the state of Denial.
    Posts
    27,126
    Quote Originally Posted by Mehrunes View Post
    So if it was the National Guard that committed the overpaying, why aren't the ones to get punished?
    Because the options are:
    A: Do nothing, nobody like this option.
    B: Subtract it from the National Guard's budget (noone is in favor of reducing military spending).
    C: Get it back from the little guy.
    Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.

    Just, be kind.

  10. #50
    Mmmm, it's 1 state out of 50. It's not a national issue, we in Nevada can't do anything about it.
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

  11. #51
    They're going to sue, they're going to win money for damages, and then the US government will have less money. Whoever decided this was a good idea is a fucking moron and should be fired from their job.

  12. #52
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Mehrunes View Post
    So if it was the National Guard that committed the overpaying, why aren't the ones to get punished?
    That's how usually how it works for most errors like this.

    You mistakenly pay your employee too much, you mistakenly deposit money into the wrong account, you disburse too much money for some entitlement (social security, welfare, etc.)... 99/100 times the people who get the money have to pay it back.

    But as many others have said, they should write this off and be done with it. Most notably because the soldiers who accepted the incentives held up their end of the agreement... They didn't just get the money for nothing, they reenlisted in the military specifically because of these incentives. Not to mention it was a decade ago.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyrt View Post
    They're going to sue, they're going to win money for damages, and then the US government will have less money. Whoever decided this was a good idea is a fucking moron and should be fired from their job.
    It is pretty difficult to sue the government, even more so in this case in particular because the government is legally in the right.

  13. #53
    Banned GennGreymane's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wokeville mah dood
    Posts
    45,475
    Well done pentagon..... ~_~

  14. #54
    It's a disgrace. Twist it turn it, favor Dems, favor Reps, however you put it it's a disgrace.

  15. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    That's how usually how it works for most errors like this.

    You mistakenly pay your employee too much, you mistakenly deposit money into the wrong account, you disburse too much money for some entitlement (social security, welfare, etc.)... 99/100 times the people who get the money have to pay it back.

    But as many others have said, they should write this off and be done with it. Most notably because the soldiers who accepted the incentives held up their end of the agreement... They didn't just get the money for nothing, they reenlisted in the military specifically because of these incentives. Not to mention it was a decade ago.

    - - - Updated - - -



    It is pretty difficult to sue the government, even more so in this case in particular because the government is legally in the right.
    It's not an error though. It was an agreement made by the US government that they are no going back on.

  16. #56
    The natural response to this garbage is "Make a time machine and give me those years back".

    Idiots shouldn't be setting precedents for fucking over the brave men and women in any branch of the military when they desperately need them to die in the Middle East for them.

  17. #57
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Wyrt View Post
    It's not an error though. It was an agreement made by the US government that they are no going back on.
    Agreements made without approval.

    In 2010, after reports surfaced of improper payments, a federal investigation found that thousands of bonuses and student loan payments were given to California Guard soldiers who did not qualify for them, or were approved despite paperwork errors.

    Army Master Sgt. Toni Jaffe, the California Guard’s incentive manager, pleaded guilty in 2011 to filing false claims of $15.2 million and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison. Three officers also pleaded guilty to fraud and were put on probation after paying restitution.
    Like I said though, they should waive the repayment.

  18. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by dd614 View Post
    The military is pretty demoralized as it is right now, from what my couple of buddies in the army tell me.
    The government hasnt really cared about its soldiers in years, both democrat and republican.
    World needs more Goblin Warriors https://i.imgur.com/WKs8aJA.jpg

  19. #59
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWalkinDude View Post
    You realize the Pentagon and Federal Government have dick all to do with the Guard right? Each state is managed by the governor and internal Guard chain of command. They only fall under the federal government when they're federalized for deployment. What happened is the California Guard liberally applied recruitment bonuses to people who didn't qualify. These are weekend warriors. The lowest of the low in terms of military quality. There's a reason the Army removed combat arms jobs from the Reserve forces.

    If the California Guard awarded bonuses the federal government didn't agree to, the cost should come from California's budget. But coming to this decision would require context and an understanding of the facts. Why let that get in the way of blaming Bush or the Pentagon.
    Quite ironic since you seem to have not read the article yourself.

    The facts (as presented by the article):
    - Pentagon had high recruitment quotas.
    - California Guard offered incentives it wasn't authorized to offer to increase recruitment.
    - Troops who signed up for the incentives received them and served.
    - Pentagon audit reveals the unauthorized incentives.
    - Recruitment/incentive officers who offered the incentives punished.
    - Pentagon, not California Guard, demands the money back.
    - California Guard is actually working with these soldiers to file appeals and request waivers from the pentagon.
    - Only the pentagon can waive what it claims is owed.

  20. #60
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWalkinDude View Post
    So what part of California offered bonuses it wasn't allowed to did I miss? None of this is Bush's fault. None of it is the Pentagon's fault. California could resolve the issue by paying back what it illegally took. Yet you haven't advocated that.
    California didn't? The national guard is almost entirely federally funded and run outside of the guard being called up by a governor to perform some action within their state.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •