Let's see... Europe existed for 2k years... that's a pretty long time, dude. We've forgotten more wars than you lot started. But for us it resulted in free democracies and civil liberties. We're pretty much at peace with each other. How's the racial tension going that you guys are sporting for basically the entire lifetime of your country's existance? Keeping it well groomed, I hear? We may have had more wars, but we figured out that you need a break from it once in a while... we learned that a long time ago.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Answer is the same as why others are crazy about their geographical birth place: T R I B A L I S M
Also I should post this.
You're from the UK? You should know that Association Football (hint: FA) was a thing to distinguish it from rugby. Hence soccer. I find it amusingly elitist when English try to tell the world they didn't invent that word when they in fact did. :P
- - - Updated - - -
No, it wasn't.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but America is only as strong as it is because of its geographical location. You have no threats on your doorstep, nobody has ever invaded you, you have just been left alone to grow and prosper, that's hardly something to hold over the rest of the world.
This is too much even for the US.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
If the only thing that made the U.S. a powerplayer was geographical in nature, the initial settlers would've been staved off by the Amerindians; so, you're wrong, and there's the correction.
The original question, "Why are Americans patriotic?", is simply too broad-stroke and generalized to be accurately answered in even a single paragraph. As someone stated early in this thread, consider the relative size differences between some of the major contenders in Europe like the UK or Germany (also, for comparative purposes, some of the smaller bodies like the Ukraine or Romania) and the United States.
The population of the UK is 64.1 million (2013), spread across 94,058 square miles. ~650+ people per square mile.
The population of Germany is 82.1 million, spread across 137,903 square miles. ~596 people per square mile.
The population of the Ukraine is 42.6 million, spread across 222,588 square miles. ~192 people per square mile.
The population of Romania is 20.1 million, spread across 92,043 square miles. ~218 people per square mile.
The population of the United States is 324.7 million, spread across 3.7 million square miles. ~86 people per square mile.
The reason it's important to fully, fully, understand the scope of the landmass we're talking about is because once you've done as much it's very easy to understand just how different a population can be from one side of the nation to the other; and while the United States is fortunate not to have linguistic hold-ups in the way they exist in places like Germany or the UK (meaning, we can all pretty much understand one another from coast-to-coast in the U.S., which isn't always a given throughout most of Europe even without considering foreign-born people) we've managed to drift apart politically and culturally in many ways, shapes and forms over the last century or two.
I struggle to see how almost all of the people posting here from northern and western Europe can on one hand recognize tiny distinctions between their countrymen, countrymen who often live within 100-200 miles from them, and hold to the opinion that those differences are massively polarizing and yet on the other hand be incapable of recognizing how a country that is in some cases 10-30 times larger than theirs would have the same issues, but which diverge at an exponentially faster rate.
Just because the U.S. doesn't happen to be splintering into different linguistic directions (which, it actually is, just not quickly) doesn't mean that the population is, or ever could be, culturally unanimous.
If you wouldn't assume that the people of Amsterdam, Netherlands and Marseille, France should theoretically behave almost identically, barring language differences, then why would you expect the people of Washington D.C. to behave identically to the people of Little Rock, Arkansas or Topeka, Kansas? Let alone between places like Boston, Massachussets and Boise, Idaho or Olympia, Washington?
Edit: To clarify the point of the last paragraph, the distance between Amsterdam and Marseille is enormously short compared to the distance between places like D.C. and Olympia, WA. So it's peculiar, to me, that people have no issue recognizing that differences would naturally emerge, over time, between Amsterdam and Marseille... but would then abandon that strain of logic when talking about places which are, in some cases, four or fives times further apart than the aforementioned Dutch and French cities.
Last edited by Fyersing; 2016-10-27 at 12:02 AM.
As bad as race relations can get in America, European countries do a far worse job handling it, or at least they would if their populations were anywhere near as racially diverse as that of the US. The reaction of even the most notably progressive and open minded European countries toward the Syrian refugee crisis has been nothing short of disgraceful, mirroring the kind of nativist rhetoric you would've heard coming out of the US 150 years ago.
Dunno, our racial tension's not quite as bad as yours is. I mean, all that refugee stuff and how y'all suck at handling it properly because you've all been so insular for so many years and that leading to a rise in ultra-nationalism. Sure, that's definitely something you learned "a long time ago" and not something that's been a major problem for the past couple years.
- - - Updated - - -
It's strong because we never had reconstruction costs like other countries did. We also made even more money by helping other countries with their post-war reconstruction.
Geography does help, though. We're far larger than any individual European nation, which beyond room for our people also means access to far more natural resources. We also have a sea border with both the Atlantic and the Pacific, which makes trade much easier for us.
So, yeah, geography is definitely a factor, but so is our being able to avoid post-war reconstruction costs. Geography is mostly why we were able to, I suppose.
europeans dont force pupils to salute the flag and sing the hymn every fucking day. Thats what americans call patriotism.
its like when your parents are hardcore catholic and u have to go to church every sunday,
as US-american pupil u must sing and salute every fucking schoolday. It was very hilarious to me as i was an exchange student in north dakota 20 years ago.
They REALLY are forced to do this shit, if they dont its a very big deal lol. Its way worse than to not go to church on sunday.
Technically two of the countries lead the airstrikes in Libya and only asked us to tag in then asked us to leave.....now its well full of isis as well.
- - - Updated - - -
Only the inner cities are having these problems where the poorest of ppl live.
- - - Updated - - -
I havent saluted the flag or sang a hymn for 20+ years and we might have done it like in music class during elementary also the majority of Americans don't attend church.
From the moment we enter school we are basically beat over the head with patriotism. Children are punished for not reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in the US, and it goes by without the blink of an eye. Whether US citizens know it or not, the message sinks into their heads. It's no wonder many of us grow up into such passionate and vehement supporters of ideals we don't really understand are common or even more prevalent in other countries around the world.