This works both ways my friend. It is hard not to have disdain for a bunch of grown ass men and women who objectively believe that the solution to their problems is to roll the state of the world back 60 years, and who stick their fingers in their ears and pitch infantile tantrums when someone tries to explain to them that that isn't a viable solution to their problems. Exactly how are you supposed to reason with, or respect the opinion of, someone who firmly believes that trying to keep a deathgrip on things as they were in the golden age of their parents is going to solve their problems, while the world moves on and leaves them behind? We can't bring back their Family Farms. We cant bring back their manufacturing jobs. We cant bring back big coal. But they refuse to move forward, and we cant make the entire fucking rest of the world move backwards to make them feel better.....
Even if Trump tanks everything the Democrats would be absolutely naive to try and prop up another white-bread Establishment candidate like they did this time around, unless they found someone with very few (If any) damning scandals and only shallow roots within the Establishment.
So, if people are still thirsty for a Populist 'Outsider' then, yes, Bernie could stand a very good chance against Trump if things go too south.
Add Bannon now to the already decent sized list of uber-right extreme radicals that are Trump's senior advisors. It's like Trump went to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck and asked them who they considered to be extreme fringe extremists that were far right of them and that's who he made his list from. Keep thinking it's overreacting and we have nothing to worry about though...
Damning scandals really don't matter. If they did, Trump would have lost purely on the fact that he is a terrible human being when observed objectively. 90% of the reason why Hillary lost is because she has the personality and charm of a mannequin. To quote someone from another forum:
in retrospect, nominating a boring but competent person against a likable and entertaining person always ends horribly, and no political party should ever, ever, ever, ever do it because the public votes entirely on likability. Facts don't matter because nobody agrees on them, and nobody voting understands policy in any detail beyond catchphrases anyway.
Reagan: objectively dumb, people liked him, so completely invincible in elections
Bill Clinton: likable, two term president in spite of being sleazy scandal-ridden diet Republican
W: dumb but likable, invincible in elections in spite of failing at everything forever
Obama: infinite charisma, wins every time in spite of being boring centrist
Clinton's objective qualifications never actually mattered to the outcome, and even if her policies were Full Communism Now for White People she would have still lost because nobody actually likes her. This was hidden by the polls all having a +5C skew for some reason right up to the end, but it's the underlying truth of the campaign. Americans never actually LIKED Hillary Clinton, the person, ever.
EPIC
I mean, his plans take a direct crap on the poor, so that's unlikely. His tax plans increases taxes for the lowest classes, his foreign trade policies would skyrocket the prices for goods used by the lower classes, and the current line of thought is that he'd have to cut social security benefits to pay for any of his ideas - which again, only is going to touch the lower and middle classes. The supposed payoff is that, half of a generation down the road, this will hopefully cause a return of manufacturing and job growth. You know, after everybody but Trump and his entire class suffers for it.
And that's completely ignoring other things he's voiced, such as a desire to eliminate the Federal minimum wage. Yep, the demographic that voted him in is going to win big league, for sure.
Trump Campaign didn't know they'd need to hire entirely new West Wing staff. Our new government ladies and gentlemen.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/leading-...bus-1479069597
Trump aides were described by those people as unaware that the entire presidential staff working in the West Wing had to be replaced at the end of Mr. Obama’s term.A) There's no reason to take him at his wordI think people should calm down, he seems to only be focusing on economic issues.
B) There are a million different ways the GOP can make life miserable for gay people besides trying to annul their marriages.
- - - Updated - - -
Gingrich claiming Bannon can't be antiSemitic because.....jewish stereotypes.
- - - Updated - - -
Seriously, nothing about this transition so far should give anyone hope for the future.
Pence can say whatever, his boss has already said that shit is over.
Republicans face divisions over ObamaCare repeal
Reince Priebus named Chief of Staff
Trump is good with Gay Marriage
Telling people that the policies of a 70 year old fat president's Vice President are irrelevant is beyond bizarre.
- - - Updated - - -
Trump's transition site is plugging his properties.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minut...-lesley-stahl/
Thing of Trump talking on 60 minutes
surprised he enjoyed his time talking to Obama and the Clintons over the phone
Omians- 70 Troll Enhancement shaman, Emerald Dream