I didn't see anyone suggest this, merely that his propaganda and rhetoric were frighteningly identical for him to get elected. But I guess it's the only way to reject someone's claims that Trump used frighteningly similar rhetoric to Hitler, to just claim that the person said something they didn't actually say. Like you know, that they believe he will go on to be Hitler 2.0. So it's a way of dismissing something so you don't have to actually address the fat that Trump is using plays straight out of hitler's playbook from before the whole genocide part.
Hitler also received tons of media backlash, and before his rise to power, he was actually banned from participating in politics for awhile. He faced intense push-back for his views. But he was elected in light of the German economic crash and mass influx of immigrants, using the fear of the latter to gain support, and securing much more support by claiming that the immigrants were mooching welfare off the hard working German people.For one thing, there's the intense scrutiny that Trump is under because of our media, freedom of speech, and the huge amount of people that are concerned about his presidency. That alone would prevent him from ever doing anything anywhere near what Hitler did.