Frankly, I have the capacity to edit user posts. It's our website policy to not do so outside of reasonable moderation duties, things like removing porn/gore images, or adding infraction messages, or changing titles on threads and whatnot. If I do so within the first three minutes, it won't have the "edited by" tag at the bottom. That doesn't mean it would be "okay" for me to maliciously edit user posts, but the legal consequence there would be "I'm no longer an MMO-C moderator", and that's about it, because it's not illegal, just against our rules for our moderator staff.
Also, the idea that you'd be able to make that case across international borders is pretty ridiculous, in and of itself. If nothing else, MMO-C's run out of the USA, and I'm Canadian.
Surprised that subreddit hasn't been shut down entirely. They shut down other blatantly racist subs and that one has been teetering dangerously close to being an online Klan rally since the election. Death threats to users, advocating violence at minorities, bans anyone who argues against them, posts RL information pulled through security holes, conspiracy theories, etc.
It really blows my mind that you can't understand how this works... like I know you're kind of silly based on what you normally post but god...
If you database edit posts and you later admit to doing it, that means MMO-Champion is legally liable for anything that gets posted on it regardless of them being edited or not.
- - - Updated - - -
Do you seriously still not understand the difference between a moderated comment and a database modified comment?
I know, which is arguably why it's still open. It doesn't change that it's become an alt right cesspool that spends a significant number of their posts trying to incite violence and form real life violence squads targeting minorities and "liberals" while idolizing Hitler and banning any opposition.
It's practically a Klan/neo Nazi sub at this point under the title of being an election discussion sub, especially with Pizzagate gone.
And what you have just stated is fundamentally incorrect. It just means that anyone accused of something where their posting to the site was part of the evidence, they would have a valid means of disputing that evidence (which isn't to say it would get thrown out, there are other ways to corroborate).
"Moderating a comment" involves editing the database, dude.Do you seriously still not understand the difference between a moderated comment and a database modified comment?
"indemnity
43 All the things you do and all the information you submit or post to reddit remain your responsibility. Indemnity is basically a way of saying that you will not hold us legally liable for any of your user content or actions that infringe the law or the rights of a third party or person in any way.
44
Specifically, you agree to hold reddit, its affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, and third party service providers harmless from and defend them against any claims, costs, damages, losses, expenses, and any other liabilities, including attorneys’ fees and costs, arising out of or related to your access to or use of reddit, your violation of this user agreement, and/or your violation of the rights of any third party or person."
Maybe people shouldn't be such absurd morons? I dunno. You dont see people posting something worthwhile having their posts edited.
Don't spew abuse then cry about getting something back. You have zero right to complain. (not the OP, but you as in those affected by this)
Seriously, you can't be fucking real...
u/spez used direct access to the database to edit posts from people he does not agree to, leaving no trace except his admission of guit. He didn't do it through normal admin or moderator means, he did something that is invisible and untraceable.
If someone posts child porn on reddit, because of what u/spez did, reddit is now legally liable for it. Is it that hard to understand?
Last edited by Ichifails; 2016-11-24 at 04:42 PM.
That's easy to understand. Reddit has never been liable of a user posted child porn to the site.
I think you misspoke though, and meant that the user would no longer be legally liable, and that is completely incorrect. At best, they could claim that Reddit edited that in, and Reddit could testify that "no, they didn't", and without evidence to back that claim and no motive for Reddit to have done so, that accusation would fail to hold merit, and the user would still be found guilty based on that evidence.
And that's ignoring the fact that the child porn would exist on that user's computer, since they uploaded it from somewhere.