I thought conspiracy theories weren't allowed??
While that did occur. Difference is, HRC has not once not agreed with the results of this lawful election. Nor has anyone in her team. She graciously accepted the results and conceded to his victory. It's the libs and the media who are stomping their feet and refusing to accept defeat.
The news is some group having found possible evidence (not proof!) that votes might have been tampered with, and recounting might be warranted. That's not a conspiracy.
(And I cringe so hard every time I see this hard-on to get to Endus. It's like he represents the "big man", and you have to fight him to show you have the balls. Goes for many people in here).
Last edited by Santti; 2016-11-24 at 08:48 PM.
Even if they do the recount the results will be the same in that Trump still wins and Hillary will look even worse than she already does. Hard to make trash look worse but she does.
I'd love to see it.
A) there is a reason why counties that she couldn't ballot box stuff as easily turned out in Trump's favor.
B) she would loose several million votes. Take away the dead people voting 3x each, the 3-6 million ineligible illegals Obama told to vote, and the ballot box stuffing and documented voter intimidation ect. ect. ect....
It's a Pandora's box that they really don't want to open.
at the end of the day I'm comfortable guessing that Trump won by 3 to 6 Million votes once you cut the fraud out.
I'm fine with that as long as we count all of them. These recounts that just target democrat heavy counties, and recount until they finally "find" enough votes to win is fucking absurd. Count them all, including overseas, military and absentee, or don't recount at all.
They have a ways to go yet. 6-7 million of lawyers fees on top of the filing fees
The Dems are famous for stuff like this. 119% voter turnout in Madison during the Walker recall. http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...nt-in-madison/
Romney earned zero votes in some urban precincts
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/romney-e...ban-precincts/
Where are the numbers that they use to make this deduction? How do they prove what they're saying?
Because otherwise the statement is about as meaningful as a pile of fresh gerbil entrails.
- - - Updated - - -
Nah, this thread is pretty clearly real. We're all engaging in it.
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
I'm not being rational in this, but I want oh-so-much to get that flipped table up against all those left-side people who were flipping it over when Trump hinted he might not accept results because elections might be rigged a week or two before them. Funny how poeple show real faces when tide turns against them like this, no?
Last edited by jackofwind; 2016-11-24 at 09:14 PM.
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment