Originally Posted by
Snowraven
Honestly, while Fidel Castro clearly did some shit, you should read up on history, as the guy before him, Fulgencio Batista, was much worse. Sure, Cuba might have been an ally of the US then and a nice vacation spot for tourists, but for the people living there it was a shithole. Fidel really helped those living in poverty rise somewhat.
If Cuba had continued being ruled by Batista, it would have turned into a shit hole for all its people as well. Also, a thing to note, Batista was originally supported by Communists too, but moved away to the US when he wanted to make a fortune (at the expense of the Cubans, which is why there was such a strong support for Fidel Castro).
Batista was so bad that 52 people (this was aprox the original number of Fidel and Hugo Chavez's group after they hid in the woods in the first movement) managed to oust him. Because people supported these 52 rebels hiding in the woods rather than him.
- - - Updated - - -
This is actually quite true. The embargo and the numerous assassination attempts gave Fidel examples for his people that the USA does indeed try to control them no matter their wishes. If these things would not have happened, or, at least, would not have been as strong, once those that remembered Batista died, Fidel could have been ousted by his own people.