That's even more interesting in the hindsight of the JFK speech: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25660
Read after "The third, and perhaps most disastrous of our failures".
I still wonder why there was no attempt at reconciliation during JFK's term, but instead, a missile crisis.
638 attempts by CIA and others according to Cuban counter-intelligence: https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...uncancampbell2
CIA claims they had 8 attempts; I believe CIA is closer to the truth in this case.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, they were investigated and ordered to stop: "No employee of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, political assassination."
You sire are full of it. Fidel Castro was THE MAN of the Millennium. A man with a vision of freedom, justice and humanity in the purest of forms. A man who had a set of balls big enough to said no to the unjust practices of the most powerful enemy in the entire world, and never give up to any threat. A man intelligent enough to keep he's people alive, strong and fighting for an ideal all these long against the bully of all bullies. And a leader with an integrity and moral stature so high, that has being capable of make that tiny island the last example of human dignity in the whole world.
The Man who rounded AIDS victims to die alone,
The Man who repressed the homosexuals and ordered killing of them,
The Man who killed his moderate political opponents in masses,
The Man who introduced the "internal visas" so his people can't travel aboard except diplomats and olympic athletes,
The Man who through the 'fake news' got the support of the NYT and the left,
The Man who wanted the World burn in the nuclear flame,
The Man who turned his country's economy to shit, even when backed by might of the Soviet Union,
...and it's the man with a vision of freedom, justice and humanity in the purest of form?
Give me a slack.
The only good thing that he's done is the removal of Batista.
Also, check the JFK's speech on October 6, 1960, will open your eyes.
Last edited by sonololo; 2016-11-26 at 11:43 PM.
What are we talking about here exactly? The US government has provided one of the highest qualities of life to its citizens. What has Castro done for his nation? Defeated a dictator, only to build a much worse regime and screw all of his citizens? As bad as it was under Batista, it was 10 times worse under this guy. Under Batista, it was a typical dictatorship. Under Castro, it was one of the poorest and harshest dictatorships in the world.
What is this, I don't even...
At least, IMO, the US still made a big mistake when supporting Batista. It, at least, should've supported Castro with the intent of aligning him with them; so he then wasn't able to create a militaristic dictatorship. Maybe some non-democratic regime, but not hard authoritarian.
Still, it's like choosing between two shits.
I doubt it could have worked, given that Castro was a communist and wanted to align with USSR, which at the time pretty much excluded any meaningful interaction with the US. What the US should have done, IMO, is support Batista, but demand harshly that he follows through with urgent democratic reforms and eventually gives his power up in favor of a democratically aligned government.
Castro was an idealist. I guess he hoped to gain both support of USSR and the US, not realizing that the relations between the two superpowers have deteriorated to the point at which associating with one means being ignored / sanctioned by another. It is a fun mental experiment though, to think on what would have happened if he had succeeded.