I eat cows, I'm doing my part.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
You're greatly underestimating how much people like their milk and Beef. I can't stand most pork, get sick of chicken before long, and love spaghetti more than my fellow man. Nevermind steak stuffed peppers Burgers...it's a long list.
And this is why I will never replace my beef with shitty Veggie substitutes. I like its taste.
Good. More demand for Texas cattle. Already taking Cali jobs. Need to take more.
People working 2 jobs in the US (at least one part-time) - 7.8 Million (Roughly 4.9% of the workforce)
People working 2 full-time jobs in the US - 360,000 (0.2% of the workforce)
Average time worked weekly by the US Workforce - 34.5 hours
This whole "Green" tackling issue, for the past number of decades, is nothing but a complete farce to make money out of it...
Nothing short of disgusting. Soon they'll introduce a 'shit' tax because of the gases produced by people themselves.
Well, Since it's all about saving the planet then we must be willing to make sacrifices. So I say ban all cows by 2025. No more red meats which will be good for people anyways and no more milk. Followed shortly by a ban on all pets and other livestock, like sheep.
I also vote we put limits on the amount we're allowed to drive, electricity we're allowed to use. In fact the Govt should mandate Govt control thermals in all houses, so they can lock the temps to 68 degrees in the winter and 75 in the summer.
After all, this is about saving the planet before there is no planet to save, so there is really no limit to what should be banned or heavily controlled
Well, that's just not true at all. The one example from the article that involved a 4 million dollar piece of equipment involved a dairy that had 1,500 cows. That's not a "small family farm".
And yes; small farms can afford this stuff. I wrote a report (with my team) on agri-business development up here, and as part of our research we spoke with local Mennonite family farms which were running things like auto parts shops alongside their farm operations. It wasn't anything for one of those shops to have a $3 million dollar laser cutter, alongside plenty of other similar equipment.
Bear in mind, these were Mennonites. The drive-a-horse-and-buggy-to-market farmers.
They've done studies on the emissions by wild ruminants, and cattle still significantly outpace what wild emissions would have been without livestock replacing them.
Oh California, you never cease to amuse.
would a family farm be able to afford a million dollars to comply? most wouldn't
and your example you gave isn't relevant or in any way equivalent
that 3 million dollar laser cutter increased productivity there for an investment that paid for its self over time and increased profit
having to fork out 1 million or more to comply to that regulation wont increase productivity or profit it is nothing but an expenses with no upside to the bottom line
like I said all this does is help the large corporate dairy farms because they are capable of absorbing that expense and there competition the small family owned farm wont there for either forcing them to sell out to the corporation or go under
There's no need for any multi-million setup. Modifying the feed does the trick.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince...ting-1.3856202
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Arbitrarily-invented numbers are arbitrary and invented.
The upside is "staying in business".and your example you gave isn't relevant or in any way equivalent
that 3 million dollar laser cutter increased productivity there for an investment that paid for its self over time and increased profit
having to fork out 1 million or more to comply to that regulation wont increase productivity or profit it is nothing but an expenses with no upside to the bottom line
You vastly underestimate the capacities of farmers, for some reason. I work directly with the local agricultural community on stuff like this.like I said all this does is help the large corporate dairy farms because they are capable of absorbing that expense and there competition the small family owned farm wont there for either forcing them to sell out to the corporation or go under
And really, it comes down to business; if your business model can't turn a profit given market conditions, then it's a flawed business model.
Them living simply shouldn't be taken to mean they're poor. Here, I'd be amazed to see a Mennonite business not have great equipment.
Not sure about your Mennonite communities, but around here (Ohio) they tend to be fairly well off (along with the Amish communities as well).
Mennonite and Amish goods and services are very popular and fetch premium prices in our surrounding areas.
I wasn't impugning them at all; I have a lot of respect for our Mennonite community and what they've done. My point wasn't that they aren't financially successful, because they are, it's that they're exactly what is meant by "small family farms". Their religious observances limit some of their use of technology (mostly when used for personal convenience, with New Order and such), but they're savvy and have a great community and work ethic.
That "being well off" comes from running their farms incredibly well and with generations of savvy. They're an example of a GOOD business model. I pointed out the tech thing mostly to underscore that they're not folks who live lives of extravagance, buying shiny new gear just to have it, and spending money they don't really have.