Chicks are grossed out by uncircumcised slug-esque dongs. Or so I've heard. #Notall
Chicks are grossed out by uncircumcised slug-esque dongs. Or so I've heard. #Notall
So you are okay with sacrificing virgins on full moons?? Religion should be something personal, something internal, cutting off parts of babies is not something that should be "freedom of religion" just like you should not be able to sacrifice virgins on a full moon.
Thinking that there is a difference between cutting up babies genitals and cutting up babies genitals seems like a severe mental gymnastic to me. And to claim that "nobody suffers from it" is rather silly, you should try to tell this to the babies that have died during this surgery. Dying might be worse case scenario, but there are plenty of other things that can and do go wrong in these surgeries, and i would not wish them on anyone.
I am a firm believer that you should not cut up babies, not their genitals not their hands or feet. Just do not cut up babies, i do not think this should be to much to ask.
Every single serial killer that has ever been caught and/or identified hasn't been circumcised.
Yeah, cause I'd rather have less enjoyment during sex to please chicks.. PS: I have never met any girl that thinks so, and I've met enough to never think it as a problem at all. I also heard circumcision makes it harder to have orgasm when you reach 40's or something cause of it.
Again, enjoy your lesser penis cause dumb parents
It's not an "all or nothing" matter. Banning circumcision without the child's consent is a pretty small step that has no real downside (apart from 'muh tradition!'). But religious tradition should never trump bodily autonomy.
And plenty of other women find circumcised dicks ugly. There is no one true generalization there.
Good policy. There are no substantive medical benefits to circumcision. It's a purely cosmetic procedure, and cosmetic procedures can't ethically be performed without informed consent.
If you are particularly bold, you could use a Shiny Ditto. Do keep in mind though, this will infuriate your opponents due to Ditto's beauty. Please do not use Shiny Ditto. You have been warned.
Sounds good to me. Genital mutilation is bad, regardless of gender.
If the dude happens to want to go through with it, once he is able to make that decision for himself, go wild!
Going to chime in here, something I rarely do. Circumcision should always be done and if it was a world wide practice, we would have eliminated HIV without finding a cure. But don't take my world for it, try the WHO
http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/malecircu...NAIDS.pdf?ua=1There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence.
Male circumcision provides only partial protection, and therefore should be only one element of a comprehensive HIV prevention package which includes: the provision of HIV testing and counseling services; treatment for sexually transmitted infections; the promotion of safer sex practices; the provision of male and female condoms and promotion of their correct and consistent use.
Not to mention, TWJ, Ronald Grey, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Circumcision also lowers the risk of acquiring herpes infection and genital ulcers in men. It reduces infection with human papilloma viruses, or HPV, in both men and their female partners. HPV is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections in the U.S., causing cervical, penile and anal cancers, as well as genital warts. Female partners of circumcised men have lower rates of vaginal infections and genital ulcers.
Circumcision doesn't impair sexual potency or pleasure, according to randomized controlled trials. These studies are considered the most credible because they compare men who are circumcised at random versus men who aren't, and the men who are circumcised during the trial can assess whether their pleasure or potency is affected by the procedure.
So before you go off spouting your uninformed opinions, try doing some research so you have an educated contribution do the discussion.
The fact that you think circumcision would give you license to have unprotected sex and lead to the elimination of HIV is well crazy. HIV spread in the US just as fast as any other part of the world, circumcision did not stop it, safe sex practices and breakthroughs in medicine did.
Can't say any of my girlfriends cared that I had a little extra skin on my Johnson. It's never been done in my family, on either side, doctors were all ready to do the procedure on myself and my brother until my parents told them no. There is money to be made from infant foreskins so that could also be a factor for American doctors pushing to have it done. I'd love to know way back when it all started why someone thought it was a great idea to cut that skin off, I'm sure there are other things to alter to set yourself apart then cutting that off.
I'm torn on this debate. I actually agree with this but at the same time am thankful that my parents had me circumcised shortly after birth.
- - - Updated - - -
It's mostly around and near the head that matters. As someone who is circumcised, orgasms are still awesome (and addicting).
The wise wolf who's pride is her wisdom isn't so sharp as drunk.
Good for Denmark. I could give 2 beans less about parental rights in this case. Nor do I care if it affects parental rights in other cases. I generally believe parents shouldn't have complete free will over their children. A fair amount of people are plainly too stupid or to irresponsible to be left to their own devices when raising children. They probably shouldn't have had children in the first place. Nor do I care about your religious rituals which state that the skin on the tip of a child's penis must be cutoff for completely illogical reasons.
Last edited by nanook12; 2016-12-08 at 08:04 PM.