China poses a more severe threat to the US than Russia does.
Spicer is saying 'nuh uh', not providing evidence.Also no proof of RNC hacking - http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/10/politi...acked-russian/
China poses a more severe threat to the US than Russia does.
Spicer is saying 'nuh uh', not providing evidence.Also no proof of RNC hacking - http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/10/politi...acked-russian/
Except you aren't actually attempting to clarify people's thoughts. You're attempting the tried and true method of "gotcha", because those questions have been answered beyond the yes or no paradigm. For example, when I pointed out that Powell discussed aluminum tubes for enriched uranium it was a direct answer to your question about "shaking a can of enriched uranium". Instead of saying "hmm, yea that does show he was indicating nuclear weapons" you whined about it not being a simple yes or no. Since the situation is more complex than a yes or no, it's an irrelevant question to ask. I mean, you certainly can insist that it be answered, but not many people are interested in entertaining pointless questions. But no, I'm sure it's about what other people don't get, and not you. I'd eyeroll here, but that's not really my thing. You can still borrow a quarter though.
They know your game simply because it is done here endlessly. It's not new, refreshing, thought provoking, or the veneer of some wonderfully salient point. It's just you being petty. Things that are obvious don't require explicit communication. Otherwise you could have made your point, since you're so clearly desperately trying to make one. Go...make it.
I don't have a quota, i just go by what you give me. Whatever repetitiveness you find in it is on you.
That time was already known well in advance.
The time also doesn't matter as much. First strike capability isn't just mobilization time, it's also carrier capabilities and such. Russia is beating the US in terms of cyber warfare but their military technology is third world compared to what the US has rolling out.
You know what's funny? I'd bet you all the money in my bank account that the people(Not all, but a vast majority) protesting over Trump winning, the latino community here in Southern Cali who are rioting/protesting, ARE Illegal. The ones who are rioting and destroying shit are only further proving Trumps point on immigration. My room mate is Mexican and he says the exact same thing, ironically. On the other hand my room mates girlfriend is illegal as well as her whole family so he's in a bit of a pickle. He is worried as all hell... so much I am afraid he would follow her down to mexico should she be deported(which I highly doubt will happen)
Last edited by Extremities; 2016-12-14 at 08:41 PM.
What if I told you Russia and the USA are controlled by the same people?
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
I don't presume to jump to conclusions and debate a point that doesn't exist in the context of discussion. None of what you're bringing up has relevance to the actual topic, rather it is factless fear-mongering and irrational rhetoric.
"Oh look, the left is scared of war. They're stupid for being irrational". Try harder.
No, because I haven't made any statements in this discussion yet. All I've done is point out how you're using fictional claims to support your own argument, which has no precedence to begin with consider no one was making those claims. Which of my "facts" would you be referring to?
I can tell that you're projecting your idea of 'someone who doesn't agreeing with me' as being the same as 'someone who trusts the CIA's claims without proof'. That, again, is jumping to a false conclusion, which you seem to have a habit of doing. I don't know why you're so quick to judge and draw conclusions when you don't even have a good grasp of what's been said in this discussion. You are the last person to be talking about 'facts'.
WTF this is like talking to a crazy ex gf, "my friend told me, that her friend told her, that sister told her that you said something mean about me. "
I have a perfect grasp on what's going on and you're trying to derail what's going on with an attack. If you want to reply to my OP that started this whole chain and actually discuss the topic I am all for willing having a discussion. Your false conclusions and silly narrative are not entertaining to anyone but yourself.
If your grasp is perfect, then why are you jumping to the conclusion that you think I believe the CIA rumors are true, or that I don't think the Russia hacks won't do harm to the country?
I'm not going to reply to your OP because it had nothing to do with the irrational arguments that you made. I gave you the option to explain yourself, but instead you choose to attack 'my statements' (which were never made).
I don't see what narrative you think I'm building here. You're destroying your own credibility all by yourself.