Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump

[Ragedaug]

How truthful is only releasing the information that aids you? Leaking DNC info and sitting on RNC info isn't particularly honest, nor should anyone think Russia was doing this for the US's benefit.

I never claimed that the leaker is honest. I just said the information is truth. Nice screen there though. I like how you continue to put all of the onus on the tattler and completely ignore the tale.

[Oktoberfest]

Seth Rich

/10char

Yup

[Elite Peon]

After the CIA provided undeniable proof of WMD's that led to the Iraq war which killed millions of people... if you believe anything they say is true then you should move to North Korea they have an awesome government you will love and is 100% honest .

Can't fucking believe there are people who believe the US intelligence agencies are capable of telling the truth ...they are warmongers that is there business that's why they want Hillary in office .

[Mormolyce]

Did not ask you. Still waiting on Mormolyce's response.

See Bodakane's post :P

- - - Updated - - -

Or maybe the EBUL RUSKIES! were just returning the favor.

So you just learned today that the US has a long history of doing exactly what Russia just did to them to other countries?

- - - Updated - - -

Until they come up with some real evidence, I'm going to assume this is nothing more than a desperate attempt from the left to discredit Trump.

Those pinko commies in the CIA, Department of Homeland Security and ODNI.

[The Emperor]

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...linton-campai/
Checkmate, crazy, neocon, Russia-hating sore losers

[Belize]

Ya - the Russians did it!

Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers

It is amazing how gullible some people are.

Daily mail?

And you call other people gullible. #Irony

- - - Updated - - -

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...linton-campai/
Checkmate, crazy, neocon, Russia-hating sore losers

Read your source, they're quoting thebDaily Mail article. A tabloid.

Checkmate, you gullible Trump supporter.

[The Emperor]

Daily mail?

And you call other people gullible. #Irony

- - - Updated - - -



Read your source, they're quoting thebDaily Mail article. A tabloid.

Checkmate, you gullible Trump supporter.

Sorry but media you would like me to refer to are propagandists, they would never make such article. Which makes discussion with you pretty pointless

[Glorious Leader]

Sorry but media you would like me to refer to are propagandists, they would never make such article. Which makes discussion with you pretty pointless

So basicalpy sources that only reinforce your world view no matter how out landish they maybe? Have you ever seen anchornman 2? Theirs a central insight in that movie about giving people what they want to hear

[The Emperor]

So basicalpy sources that only reinforce your world view no matter how out landish they maybe? Have you ever seen anchornman 2? Theirs a central insight in that movie about giving people what they want to hear

Do you understand the irony, I wonder

[Glorious Leader]

Do you understand the irony, I wonder

I understand you think theirs irony

[Deleted]

That this might have all started from Putin having his fee-fees hurt by Clinton is too perfect.

You do get that this just conjecture?
They posit that since the Russians hacked the DNC, therefore Putin must have ordered it and the consequent leaking, given the scale, length and risk of said operation.
This is like saying, given the US War In Algeria, Obama must have ordered it.
But as of yet, there is of course no proof of the secret ground war against the alien invasion in Algeria, but if it was a thing, Obama must have ordered it.
- And that's not hyperbole on my part:

The statement said officials believed that "only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities." That was an intelligence judgment based on an understanding of the Russian system of government, which Putin controls with absolute authority.

[Belize]

Sorry but media you would like me to refer to are propagandists, they would never make such article. Which makes discussion with you pretty pointless

At this point, I'd accept an original Fox article that doesn't source anything else.

But all you have are tabloids, unabashedly partisan (and often outright lying) "news" and blog posts.

Which makes discussions with you utterly pointless as you're unable to bring up any sort of checkable facts.

[The Emperor]

I understand you think theirs irony

Read Belize s previous post to get the irony, regarding daily mail

- - - Updated - - -

At this point, I'd accept an original Fox article that doesn't source anything else.

But all you have are tabloids, unabashedly partisan (and often outright lying) "news" and blog posts.

Which makes discussions with you utterly pointless as you're unable to bring up any sort of checkable facts.

Im finished with you, go read MSM propaganda aND keep believing it

[Belize]

Read Belize s previous post to get the irony, regarding daily mail

- - - Updated - - -



Im finished with you, go read MSM propaganda aND keep believing it

Aw, are we getting a little salty? That's a shame, because I'm not done with you, darling.

You have such little weight behind your argument that you have to resort to platitudes, and trying to end a discussion early. You can't even refute my statement about what your sources are.

This leads me to a second point, why are you Trump supporters so butt-buddy with Russia anyways?

Is it because Trump likes them, and you have no original thoughts of your own and have to be led around like a flock of sheep?
Is it because you can't bring yourself to admit they have meddled in the election, and that you didn't win on your own?
Or is it because deep down, you're tired of having to go through the democratic process every 4 years, and bot always winning, so it'd be easier to have a Beloved Leader like Putin that wins parts of his country by 110%?

Riddle me this.

[Dadwen]

"secret cia assessment"

From what source did you get this?

One thing I've learned lately is that 99% of the internet is bullshit >_>

the other 1% is porn.

*and some people are trying to say Hackers releasing info that only benefits them is odd huh, you're somehow surprised someone that is doing something unethical (which hacking is) is being unethical or people are expecting them be ethical by releasing both side, color me shocked.... Maybe they didn't read the hackers bylaws....)

Sigh, I weep for humanity sometimes.........

[The Emperor]

Aw, are we getting a little salty? That's a shame, because I'm not done with you, darling.

You have such little weight behind your argument that you have to resort to platitudes, and trying to end a discussion early. You can't even refute my statement about what your sources are.

This leads me to a second point, why are you Trump supporters so butt-buddy with Russia anyways?

Is it because Trump likes them, and you have no original thoughts of your own and have to be led around like a flock of sheep?
Is it because you can't bring yourself to admit they have meddled in the election, and that you didn't win on your own?
Or is it because deep down, you're tired of having to go through the democratic process every 4 years, and bot always winning, so it'd be easier to have a Beloved Leader like Putin that wins parts of his country by 110%?

Riddle me this.

Your statements are so laughable, I would not waste my time refuting them, but since I have got nothing else to do right now, I'll indulge you.

1) daily mail and blog posts are not to be equated. Before you claim they lack credibility, you better prove it, rather than just throw baseless accusations. If you re just parroting what your mainstream media is spewing, that only they are to be trusted, well, your choice, I shall not waste time proving you're wrong, given that anti mainstream media candidate actually won this election.

2) second point of yours is even more childish and shows how brainwashed by leftist media you are. We have one common enemy with Russia - terrorism. Do you think that two countries with nuclear arsenal capable of destroying the world many times over would better be allies, than be confrontational, like Hillary wanted it. And no, Putin is not a power hungry dictator grabbing foreign lands, simply because coup in Ukraine was architected in the USA, by Nuland and co, and CIA of course, so Putin was made to act. Wanna talk about 2008 Georgia? Don't, because that was a provocation as well. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...th-Russia.html
Jeez I hope you don't mind the Telegraph.

3) Lastsly, you claim (or rather parrot your beloved media) that Russia hacked election. This is entirely false, a good example of misplacing ideas, swapping them, that is so common in mainstream media you seem to be so fond off. Russia hacked into the DNC, and released their incriminating emails. Are we to blame the whistleblower?? Oh and we still can't say Russia did hack it, because there is no proof, there never will be, only baseless accusation and CIA "secret statements" and"we believe it's Russia" kind of statements, spun in mainstream media over and over again, just until you yourself would start "believing" it's Russia.

I can foresee that your reply would be that they did not release the RNC data. Okay, so what? Is it suddenly "hacking" our election? Ofc not, stop believing cnn if you know what's good for you

[TZucchini]

Weird that the party of Reagan is now embracing Russia, and criticizing the CIA and other intelligence agencies. Scratch that. It's not weird. It's fucking bizarre.

My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.

[Bodakane]

Your statements are so laughable, I would not waste my time refuting them, but since I have got nothing else to do right now, I'll indulge you.

1) daily mail and blog posts are not to be equated. Before you claim they lack credibility, you better prove it, rather than just throw baseless accusations. If you re just parroting what your mainstream media is spewing, that only they are to be trusted, well, your choice, I shall not waste time proving you're wrong, given that anti mainstream media candidate actually won this election.

2) second point of yours is even more childish and shows how brainwashed by leftist media you are. We have one common enemy with Russia - terrorism. Do you think that two countries with nuclear arsenal capable of destroying the world many times over would better be allies, than be confrontational, like Hillary wanted it. And no, Putin is not a power hungry dictator grabbing foreign lands, simply because coup in Ukraine was architected in the USA, by Nuland and co, and CIA of course, so Putin was made to act. Wanna talk about 2008 Georgia? Don't, because that was a provocation as well. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...th-Russia.html
Jeez I hope you don't mind the Telegraph.

3) Lastsly, you claim (or rather parrot your beloved media) that Russia hacked election. This is entirely false, a good example of misplacing ideas, swapping them, that is so common in mainstream media you seem to be so fond off. Russia hacked into the DNC, and released their incriminating emails. Are we to blame the whistleblower?? Oh and we still can't say Russia did hack it, because there is no proof, there never will be, only baseless accusation and CIA "secret statements" and"we believe it's Russia" kind of statements, spun in mainstream media over and over again, just until you yourself would start "believing" it's Russia.

I can foresee that your reply would be that they did not release the RNC data. Okay, so what? Is it suddenly "hacking" our election? Ofc not, stop believing cnn if you know what's good for you

^TLDR:

Russia good. US intelligence community bad. Trump emperor make candy dreams come true.

[The Emperor]

^TLDR:

Russia good. US intelligence community bad. Trump emperor make candy dreams come true.

Perhaps in your simplistic mind it is so, which is unsurprising, really given your post history

[Bodakane]

Perhaps in your simplistic mind it is so, which is unsurprising, really given your post history

No you're right. That wasn't fair to you at all.

I completely mischaracterized your stance, as you are anti Russia, anti trump and Pro US intelligence.